Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Tesla Motors Adds A Factory, Loses A Lawsuit (In A Good Way)

Follow Richard

Tesla's new facility in Palo Alto, California

Tesla's new facility in Palo Alto, California

Enlarge Photo

It's a great news day for Tesla Motors: not only is the company moving into new digs in Palo Alto, California, but also Tesla's co-founder and former CEO Martin Eberhard has dropped his lawsuit against the automaker and current CEO Elon Musk.

As for that first item: Tesla announced yesterday that it will lease a 350,000 square-foot facility in the Stanford Research Park in Palo Alto, where it will develop and manufacture components for its all-electric vehicles. The bulk of those components will be electric powertrains and chargers, which Tesla already sells to one of its larger shareholders, Daimler, and which will likely be used in the two companies' collaboration on a new Smart vehicle.

According to a press release from Tesla (pasted below) the facility will hire 350 employees to start, with the possibility of adding 300 additional workers down the line. There's no mention of the output we can expect from the new plant, but obviously this means that Tesla will be able to ramp up production of its own vehicles, as well as components for partners and third-parties. There's also no word on Tesla's monthly rent in the new space, but we know it'll be covered -- at least in part -- by the $465 million grant Tesla received from the U.S. Department of Energy. That's only fair, since the grant is intended to be used to manufacture electric drivetrains, and Tesla can't very well do that without a production facility.

On the legal front, Martin Eberhard had been suing the company for breach of contract and slander. (Short version: he's missing $100,000 from his severance package, and he wasn't especially happy about being blamed by Musk and others in the press for Tesla's financial problems. Nor was he pleased that others were taking credit for founding the company.) Eberhard and his lawyer have declined to comment on why they've dropped the case, which seems an especially curious move since a judge gave the case the go-ahead just a couple of weeks back. We're not betting kind around here, but if we were, most of us would wager that the situation was resolved out of court -- although some might contend that Eberhard finally saw the error of his litigious ways. Expect to see a steamy tell-all on the Barnes & Noble bargain rack sometime before the holiday season.

* * * * *

Tesla to open power train facility in Palo Alto, California

Leading electric vehicle maker will also move corporate headquarters to Stanford Research Park in Palo Alto

PALO ALTO, Calif.-The City of Palo Alto and Tesla Motors announced today that Tesla will develop and manufacture electric vehicle components in a renovated building in the Stanford Research Park in Palo Alto.

Tesla, the only automaker that is already producing and selling highway-capable electric vehicles, will lease an approximately 350,000-square-foot building on a 23-acre parcel at 3500 Deer Creek Road. The facility will supply all-electric powertrain solutions to Tesla Motors vehicles and other automakers, greatly accelerating the availability of mass-market EVs.

The world’s premier EV manufacturer will also move its corporate headquarters from San Carlos to the site later this year. Roughly 350 employees will work in Palo Alto initially, with space for up to 650 people at the facility.  

Tesla’s lease of this facility is a creative, adaptive reuse and modernization of a manufacturing facility formerly occupied by Hewlett-Packard and Agilent Technologies. The three-building complex is minutes away from Stanford’s main campus and from the garage in Palo Alto where Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard built their original audio oscillator.


Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comment (1)
  1. That $50,000 Model S pricetag is the functinal equivalent of $30,000 for and ICE car, because of the fuel economy, tax breaks, miniscule maintenance requirements, etc. That is, it would carry and run for about the same monthly expense as a leased $30K gasoline car.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Try My Showroom
Save cars, write notes, and comparison shop with hi-res photos.
Add your first car
Advertisement
Take Us With You!
   
Advertisement

 
© 2014 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.