Find a Car

Disenfranchised Dealers Battle Chrysler, GM In D.C.

Follow Richard Creative Commons license Creative Commons license

Enlarge Photo

The U.S. House of Representatives is considering not one, but two bills that would provide legal remedies to the 2,100 dealers cut from the Chrysler and GM networks during each company's recent restructuring.

Although the text of those bills hasn't filtered into the congressional database just yet, reports indicate that both would return dealers to their respective networks, giving them the rights and legal standing they had prior to the time that Chrysler and General Motors filed for bankruptcy. As a result, reinstated dealers that have the wherewithal to reopen their doors could do so; those that couldn't open could force Chrysler and GM to repay them for a portion of their assets, as per state law.

The dealers' lobbying efforts for these bills have generated massive support in the House: one bill on the floor has nearly 200 co-sponsors, and the other flew out of committee with unanimous approval. Across the way, support in the Senate seems much more sparse, but to be fair, dealers haven't focused much attention on that side yet.

Obviously, Chrysler and GM are opposed to the two bills, insisting that the bloat of their dealer networks is largely responsible for their massive overhead and their subsequent losses. Furthermore, they argue, making payouts to closed dealerships would seriously curtail the amount of operating dollars at each company's disposal. Likewise, the Obama administration has stated strong opposition to these bills--which isn't surprising, since it helped engineer the dealer cuts in the first place. Whether congress will build enough support for this legislation to override a presidential veto remains to be seen.

The bitter irony in all this is that many of the elected officials who vociferously opposed the Detroit bailout mere months ago now insist that Chrysler and GM--which, by extension, means the federal government--prop up 2,100 more businesses. To judge by comments this story is generating online, the American public--who are finally getting used to the idea of a federally financed auto industry--aren't too happy about congress asking for a do-over. Drop us a line or leave a comment below to let us know where you stand.


Follow Us

Comments (2)
  1. The closed Dealers should absolutely have their voice heard and be allowed to reopen. GM was the company that ran itself into the ground - not the dealerships. If the dealership has poor financial management and isn't able to sell cars, they will close. If the dealerships bought the franchise, are able to sell cars and are financially stable enough to keep the doors open, GM should not be allowed to force their hardship on others.

  2. Congress and the senate should pass this bill in landslide support.Not only do you give back dealers their stores you give back thousands of jobs that were lost.I still dont understand how GM and Chrysler think it costs them money to have these dealers stay open,when dealers pay for the cars they sell and pay for the parts they also sell to the public.DEALERS who can make it will make it,dealers who cant will go out of business just like any other business that fails.Taking away something that has been bought and paid for,and is not reimbursed for that product or service is not only unlawful but outright stealing.Give back these dealers there lively hood and give back hard working employees their jobs.Turn this total outrage into something positive for once,dont let a few mis managed,unforgiving,self proclaimed experts get their way.ITS TIME WE DO THE RIGHT THING!.I bet if you took a public poll on this,IT would have overwhelming support for this BILL!

Commenting is closed for old articles.
© 2015 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.