Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Ford Pulling The Trigger On The Sable


2009 Mercury Sable

2009 Mercury Sable

Enlarge Photo

Back in 1986, the then-new Ford Taurus energized the American mid-size sedan market. Its twin, the all-new Mercury Sable, slinked around in the large shadow cast by the bull, providing a modestly more up-market look to the higher-volume Ford. While the Mercury Sable first went out of production in 2004 (only to return in 2008), it is now officially out of production again, as of last Thursday.

Over the years, fewer and fewer buyers seemed to care about the Sable, especially as the Taurus slid into the "rental fleet only" category. Ford demonstrated that it wasn't willing to invest in the Sable, as the name was abandoned for the launch of the 2005 Ford Five-Hundred and Mercury Montego.


In 2007, new Ford boss Alan Mulally at the Chicago Auto Show that the Sable nameplate would return. Compared to the 2007 Montego, the 2008 Sable was significantly upgraded and proved to be an solid choice for those shopping for full-size sedans.  (See our review on the 2009 Mercury Sable.) The sedan's huge interior and high seating position provide a comfortable environment for older drivers. Visibility is excellent, and performance with Ford's 3.5-liter V-6 is absolutely adequate for this class of car.

In the last few years, Ford has plucked many feathers from Mercury's helmet feathers. With Sable's exit, Mercury is left with the Milan (twin to the Ford Fusion), Mariner (twin to the Ford Escape), Mountaineer (twin to the Ford Explorer) and Grand Marquis (twin to the Crown Victoria). The Mountaineer and Grand Marquis are likely to go out of production in the next few model years. We have not seen any new Mercury products at Ford Motor Company events, so this does leave us wondering about the future of the brand.

The Detroit News touches on the future of the Mercury in their story on the Sable heading out of production.


 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (4)
  1. "What incremental sales with lower marginal cost will buy you.."

    This bit of P&G marketing from the 60's & 70's should have died off long ago (no offense to P&G).
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. "re: What incremental sales with lower marginal cost will buy you"

    No kidding...I was going to say the same thing. Mercury should have been cut loose a long, long time ago...They have not had their "own" car ever, well maybe that poor excuse for a Cougar. LOL
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. "What incremental sales with lower marginal cost will buy you"

    No kidding...I was going to say the same thing. Mercury should have been cut loose a long, long time ago...They have not had their "own" car ever, well maybe that poor excuse for a Cougar. LOL
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. "Things change"

    Mercury has not had a place for sometime and Lincoln now is what Mercury once was. Things change and Fords biggest mistake was not letting go sooner. In the 50's and 60's Mercury car were essentially Ford but significantly differnet in looks and personality. What better example than the 1967 Mustang and Couger. They were the same car but completely differnet. The Lincoln brand at the time only had one or two models that were way upscale. Today Lincoln is what Mercury used to be so what should Mercury be.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

 
© 2013 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.