Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

GMC Announces Pricing for 2009 Sierra Hybrid


2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid Crew Cab

2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid Crew Cab

Enlarge Photo
GMC claims its 2009 Sierra Hybrid pickup combines the fuel efficiency of a mid-size sedan with uncompromised full-size truck capability. And while the first claim is a bit of a stretch--at least on the highway side of things at 22 mpg--the 21 mpg city rating is indeed competitive with powerful sedans, and both city and highway ratings blow away many competitive full-size trucks. Making the impressive economy possible is GM's two-mode hybrid system, which uses electric motors housed within the transmission to aid city acceleration, removing most of the burden of pushing all that mass around in stop-and-go driving.

But why did GM insist on fitting a 6.0-liter V-8 cranking out 332 horsepower for the hybrid application? Performance is definitely important to truck guys and gals, but it seems a shame that GM avoided the opportunity to deliver a full-size truck that soars past 25 mpg on the highway. With its high-torque electric motors ensuring healthy around-town performance, it seems superfluous to have all those cubic inches sucking gasoline underhood. In fact, in GM's upcoming baby Duramax Diesel, efficiency is rumored to meet or exceed 30 mpg, and its workhorse engine should easily meet the 6,100-pound tow rating of the Sierra Hybrid. At 4.5 liters and with a turbocharger that boosts performance only when truly needed, the Duramax approach seems more intelligent for finding the happy medium between performance and efficiency. Mercedes makes do with only 3.0 liters for its 5,000-pound-plus GL320 BlueTEC clean diesel SUV, and as such that vehicle edges close to 30 mpg on the highway.

The Sierra Hybrid starts at a pretty steep $39,365 for the most basic 2WD setup, no small change. But federal tax incentives of up to $2,200 for many customers help ease the sticker shock and recoup the price of the tech-heavy hybrid system. And GM's new trucks have made leaps and bounds in refinement, comfort, and drivability, so rest assured this is no crude beast of burden. However, unless you frequently haul big loads or seriously need the capability of a pickup, you'd be better served by one of GM's own mild hybrid sedans (i.e. Chevy Malibu Hybrid) that easily surpass 30 mpg on the highway. Or perhaps a new clean diesel like the VW Jetta TDI, which handily earns 40-plus mpg on the highway (or 58 mpg in the hands of mileage-busting couple John and Helen Taylor).

GM co-developed the two-mode system with BMW, Mercedes, and Chrysler, and it can be found also on the recently departed Chrysler Aspen/Dodge Durango SUV hybrids (does the world really want big, heavy hybrids?), on GM's Escalade and Tahoe hybrids, as well as on BMW's sybaritic new 7 Series active hybrid. None of these vehicles can be considered fuel misers, but we welcome their significant reduction in consumption, moving them from from the uber-thirsty teens to the semi-thirsty 20s. That's progress we can believe in, and change we're glad auto companies are investing in.--Colin Mathews

2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid Crew Cab

2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid Crew Cab

Enlarge Photo


---

Make sure you check out our partner sites dedicated to focused news, reviews and more for Ford, Chevrolet, Toyota, Honda, and the Toyota Prius.
Advertisement
 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (4)
  1. Another Automotively illiterate, IDIOTIC design.
    Instead of offering the Sierra with a MODERN, ULTRA CLEAN, ULTRA FUEL EFFICIENT DIESEL, which is IDEAL for pickups and SUVS, the idiots at GM offer a... HYBRID TRUCK??????
    Give me an effing break!
    Apparently, the stupidity of the Detroit 3 knows NO LIMITS.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. I own a Diesel Jeep(powered by MB)and the 210 horses are more than enough. I get 27 mpg on the highway and I am able to pass without any issues. Every truck and SUV should be Diesel. The hybrid concept does not yield the MPG and the MPG increases do not offset the additional cost for the hybrid model.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. Sean: You are quite right. The 210 HP are more than sufficient, because what matters is NOT the HP but the TORQUE, and Diesels have HUGE Torque, much bigger than a comparable gas engine, and that Torque is available at very LOW RPM.
    The only people that need to consider hybrids are people that 1. do a lot of miles a year and 2. these are mainly CITY, NOT Highway miles.
    On the highway, (at 75 MPH on cruise control, for example) the Hybrid is an UTTERLY idiotic design, since you carry about 500 lbs extra of a second motor and a whole load of batteries, and you do can't use them.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Actually agree with Ed, if you want to improve the effeciency of a truck then you go diesel, the rest of the world knows this, get witht he program GM. In the end though people don't buy trucks for their effeciency if you do your an idiot. Another reason for a diesel is the torque and trucks need that to move their heft.
    I think automakers are going to wake to the notion that most people don't won't a hybrid, it is generally an expensive way to improve effecincy that adds mechanical and electrical complexity. I would sur enot want to own one of these hybrids in 10 years time.
    I am all for those that want effeciency buy a diesel those that want power go for petrol.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion? Join the conversation!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Try My Showroom
Save cars, write notes, and comparison shop with hi-res photos.
Add your first car
Take Us With You!
   
Advertisement

 
© 2014 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.
Advertisement