By
Marty Padgett
Marty Padgett
Editorial Director
BIO
Marty Padgett is High Gear Media's Editorial Director, overseeing the words that skim across High Gear Media's portfolio of automotive destinations...
More
LATEST ARTICLE
30 Days Of 2013 Ram 1500: Photo Gallery
Our month with the 2013 Ram 1500 is about half over, so it's time to switch gears. The Ram's been...
Read More
- #5LEADERBOARD RANK
- 5164ARTICLES CONTRIBUTED
- 111COMMENTS POSTED

2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer 4dr 2WD exterior front left
Enlarge Photo
GM has confirmed that the Moraine, Ohio, plant that builds GMT360 SUVs (
Chevy TrailBlazer,
GMC Envoy,
Saab 9-7x) will be shuttered just in time for Christmas. That's the lump of coal that 1,100 Moraine workers will be getting in their stockings this December 23.
Originally, the plant was supposed to go offline in 2010, but recently the closing date was moved up to early '09. Wall Street woes and stock price freefalls surely forced GM's hand.
SUV sales are not going to stop altogether, as there will always be a need for vehicles that excel at towing, toting, hauling, and conquering the wilds. But the popularity of the SUV is definitely in decline, and as such, only the best and the brightest will survive (
31-mpg Audi Q7, anyone?). Gas prices are up, jobs are disappearing, 401(k)s are in jeopardy, hybrids are in vogue, and dismal sales plus GM's financial crisis has forced it to take the mediocre, slow-selling GMT360 out behind the barn for a quick mercy-killing. And not a moment too soon.
(wikimedia commons)
The GMT360 SUVs were supposed to be a revolutionary new mid-size SUV from GM back around the turn of the millennium. Ford had been handily beating GM's mid-size SUVs with
Explorer sales, and GM needed to up the ante. What resulted was one of those design-by-committee pieces of mediocrity: lots of smart engineering watered down hopelessly by the bean counters, all resulting in a vehicle not a whole lot more successful than the ancient S-10 Blazer/ S-15 Jimmy it replaced.
(wikimedia commons)
The GMT360's 4.2-liter six, GM's first in-line six in decades, is butter smooth, employs variable-valve timing (on the exhaust camshaft, anyway), and boasts nearly 300 horsepower. In four-wheel-drive guise, it even locates the front axle half shafts right through the tall engine's oil pan for space efficiency. That's smart engineering and a cool detail one wouldn't expect in a GM truck. But the fact that this engine doesn't have the low-end guts of the rough, hoary old 4.3-liter V-6 it replaced is shocking. It asks the meat-and-potatoes truck/SUV crowd to scream around all day at 5,000 rpm--that's where the 4.2-liter in-line six makes its mojo (in its current version, the engine's 277 pound-feet occur at 4,800 rpm, its 291 hp at 6,000 rpm).
(wikimedia commons)
GM also had one of its infamous badge-engineering field days with the GMT360. At its height, there were six of these beasts, including the Buick Rainier, the Oldsmobile Bravada (oops, bye-bye Olds), and even a funky center-mounted ignition key couldn't fool people into thinking that this was a Saab. There were awkward extended-wheelbase versions, aka Chevrolet TrailBlazer EXT and GMC Envoy XL, and a nearly useless Envoy XUV that was killed off nearly as soon as it was put on sale. Oh, yeah, and poor Isuzu got a little piece of the pie in the form of the Ascender.
(wikimedia commons)
Would Saturn be better off if GM had realized the market was changing? Maybe. Would something like the
Chevy Volt already be here today if the big mid-sizes utes had been axed earlier? Possibly, but not likely. SUV sales didn't start cratering until 2005, when the GMT360s were already halfway through their shelf lives. Has GM learned the lesson of badge engineering and connecting with the market at exactly the right time? No (Acadia, Outlook, Traverse, and Enclave) and maybe.--
Colin Mathews
Have an opinion?
Reece Posted: 10/14/2008 6:46pm PDT
Ed Posted: 10/15/2008 10:01am PDT
His black H3 Hummer looks UNBELIEVABLY UGLY and unrrfined, BTW. A ridiculous design, esp. viewed from the Side.
NOW if GM offered these StupidUglyVehicles with a MODERN, EFFICIENT DIESEL, and 30-50% better MPG with no loss of performance, they would have done MUCH MUCH better, and gas would be even cheaper for all the rest of us.
John Posted: 10/15/2008 10:43am PDT
Ed Posted: 10/15/2008 1:32pm PDT
it is VW, NOT BMW, and of course FORD (Focus and Fusion, among others) that make cars in Mexico
John V Posted: 10/16/2008 8:59am PDT
The niche market of people-who-need-to-transport-large-potted-plants-upright has been completely, utterly abandoned. Damn them !!
Colin Mathews Posted: 10/21/2008 2:28am PDT
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!