By
Marty Padgett
Marty Padgett
Editorial Director
BIO
Marty Padgett is High Gear Media's Editorial Director, overseeing the words that skim across High Gear Media's portfolio of automotive destinations...
More
LATEST ARTICLE
30 Days Of 2013 Ram 1500: Heading West
Our 30-Day 2013 Ram 1500 has made its way safely to our Little Rock bureau. If you're following our...
Read More
- #5LEADERBOARD RANK
- 5166ARTICLES CONTRIBUTED
- 111COMMENTS POSTED
General Motors' ubiquitous 3.8-liter V-6 is soon to become extinct. For '09, it is replaced by GM's (more) modern 3.9-liter V-6 in the
Buick Lucerne, leaving it barely hanging on in the
Buick LaCrosse and
Pontiac Grand Prix, which share a platform. Some will cheer the eventual passing of this antediluvian push-rod motor, while others will wax poetic about its bulletproof reputation, easy low-end torque, and storied supercharged and turbocharged versions.
Neither LaCrosse nor Grand Prix are competitive players in the crowded mid-size sedan/sport sedan segment (think
Honda Accord,
Toyota Camry,
Chevrolet Malibu...but of course Buick would like you to think Lexus
ES350, and Pontiac would like you to think
Acura TL). That's partially due to their base engine, the 3.8-liter V-6, which is coarse and inefficient compared to its rivals' modern powerplants.
The 3.8-liter is of the ancient, but space-efficient, push-rod, overhead valve design that Chevrolet popularized with its small-block V-8 of the 1950s. In fact, the first version was a shortcut engine originally engineered by Buick in the 1960s simply by lopping two of the cylinders off its short-lived 3.5-liter V-8, though a cast-iron block replaced the V-8's aluminum block for cost reasons. According to
Wikipedia, Buick launched it as the "Fireball V-6" in 1962.
In later iterations, the engine grew to its current 3.8 liters, sharing identical bore spacing and V-angle (90 degrees) as a larger Buick V-8 produced in the same plant.
Alas, a 90-degree V-6 isn't a very happy, smooth-running beast unless balance shafts quell vibrations in the compromised design (a 60-degree V-6 sends balanced power pulses to the crankshaft). The 3.8-liter loped along under the hoods of countless GM cars without balance shafts until the 1980s, at which point it became a much more pleasant and smooth-running motor.
The 3.8-liter V-6 was always meant as a low-rpm torque producer, and was employed in posh, floaty vehicles like Buicks, Oldsmobiles, and upscale Pontiacs where an understressed motor was meant to connote luxury. But being of old-school design, it didn't like to rev, and so it was perfectly happy torquing around town under grandma's gentle right foot. It got a serious boost via turbocharging in the awesome Buick Regal GNX of the '80s, which could easily smoke muscle cars like
Mustangs and
Corvettes of the day. But usually it was under the hood of your mom's '98 Regency Brougham or your dad's Bonnneville SE. Or in miserable economy, emissions-choked sleds like the 1977 Buick version that huffed out all of 110 hp.
GM's serious R&D has more than kept push-rod valve actuation a competitive technology (7.0-liter, 505 horsepower
Z06 V-8, anyone?), and some of those advancements have trickled down to the venerable 3.8-liter. It is now relatively civil, smooth, and torquey. But it's still not happy at high rpm, and it can't compete with GM's own 60-degree push-rod V-6 family in both 3.5- and 3.9-liter flavors. That 3.9-liter benefits from variable valve timing, making it both more efficient, more powerful, and smoother due to its balanced nature than the 3.8, hence GM's decision to put it in the Buick Lucerne as base engine for '09.
Once GM kills the Grand Prix (the
Pontiac G8 slots into that niche now), and updates the LaCrosse, we expect this engine's fate to be sealed. The engine won't go out without leaving a mark;
Wikipedia calls it "one of the most-produced engines in history," with more than 25 million having rolled off the assembly line.--
Colin Mathews
Have an opinion?
Tom L Posted: 10/1/2008 9:10am PDT
JKD Posted: 10/1/2008 10:29am PDT
timothy archie Posted: 8/2/2009 5:29pm PDT
Nate M Posted: 1/6/2011 10:38am PST
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!