By
Marty Padgett
Marty Padgett
Editorial Director
BIO
Marty Padgett is High Gear Media's Editorial Director, overseeing the words that skim across High Gear Media's portfolio of automotive destinations...
More
LATEST ARTICLE
Hyundai Tucson Vs. Nissan Rogue: Compare Cars
In a few short years, what difference. Now, the set of compact crossovers is superior, and some of...
Read More
- #5LEADERBOARD RANK
- 5162ARTICLES CONTRIBUTED
- 111COMMENTS POSTED
We won't do a full test drive of the new 2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI CleanDiesel until mid-September. But how to deal with the diesel itch? How about driving one at a showroom, where testers are available like the"free" bottles of cologne over at Macy's?
VW has a monumental task ahead of it: convincing the American public that diesel vehicles, and higher-priced diesel fuel, are a smart, efficient, and enjoyable way to drive. To that end, VW has intelligently equipped each of its North American dealers with one demo-only vehicle to promote its new high-tech, 2.0-liter TDI CleanDiesel (Turbo Direct Injection with 50-state legal emissions, and indeed a cleaner emissions profile than many new gasoline engines). These demo vehicles, white Volkswagen Jetta TDI Clean Diesel sedans, are playfully splattered with artsy green decals representing nature, leaves, and environmentalism in general. On the back of the sedans, VW's personable sans-serif lettering urges, "Take me for a test drive" on the trunk lid. On the bumper the, in green, is the URL: goodcleandieselfun.com.
I confess I've been waiting for this moment...with perhaps an abnormal amount of excitement. A childhood hater of diesel, thanks in no small part to my father's painfully poky and noxiously smoky 1980 Peugeot 505 NON-turbo Diesel with all of 76 horsepower, I've pulled an unthinkable 180 in the last two years. The purchase and continual restoration of a 1982 Mercedes-Benz 300TD (the turbo, thank God), and the realization that diesel engines will run on mildly processed waste vegetable oil (otherwise known as biodiesel) convinced me. I'm now a diesel fanatic, I confess, and recent advances in critical diesel areas such as injection technology, exhaust scrubbing capabilities, and variable-vane turbocharging have eliminated the compromises one had to make back in 1982 when deciding to purchase a diesel. And those same technologies have made the efficiency gains of a diesel even more dramatic.
But enough waxing about my latest obsession. I brought my father along for historical perspective, and together we headed to Jim Ellis VW in suburban Atlanta, Ga. Thank God our salesman, Rocky, had an attitude and an approach as simple and no-frills as his name. No pressure, no attempt to sell or linger in the showroom. He threw out a few facts about the 2.0 TDI, got the keys, eased the Jetta from its perch smack in front of the showroom, and let my father take the helm.
As a passenger, from the comfortable backseat of the Jetta (comfortable except for my head brushing the rearmost portion of the headliner), the experience was remarkable in its normalcy. There simply is zero diesel clatter to be heard, no strained revving for acceleration, and no untoward vibration or harmonic resonance from an engine with higher reciprocating mass, a heavy-duty valvetrain, and a seriously high compression ratio (as is the case for all diesels). The sounds were muted and smooth, and the shifting from VW's trick DSG transmission was utterly transparent. The Jetta's taut suspension and good bump absorption remain intact. The only oddity I noticed was a mild, low-rpm thrum, as the DSG seemed to keep the engine operating at extremely low rpms (just above 1,000) with my father's admittedly conservative right foot.
Yawn. When Rocky commented that "it has a tiptronic" (quite possibly the most overused transmission term of late) and proceeded to click up and down the gears in lightning-quick fashion as only a dual-clutch automated manual can do, I rolled my eyes inwardly. Apparently he thought we were being motivated by a conventional torque converter. Noticing that the only indication of gearshift in this Jetta was a sudden, rapid change in RPM, my father commented that the transmission seemed uncommonly smooth. My impatience reached the tipping point on this flat, boring test route around the dealership, and I suddenly asked to drive.
I strapped myself in, curious to see what 236 pound-feet of torque feels like in a Jetta, and even more curious to see just how quick its variable-vane turbo can deliver on that powerful promise. Placing the selector level just below D in the "S" mode (holds gears longer, engages the clutch more aggressively), I released the brake and planted the throttle to the carpet. Let's just say the drive got a lot more exciting after I left twin rubber marks leaving the Jim Ellis dealership lot. What turbo lag?
Formerly a pussycat, Rocky now turned into a bit of a watchdog, trying to keep me on the same flat, boring "test" ring a couple of miles around the dealership. I would have none of it, and found a steep loading ramp in what looked like an abandoned warehouse. "Watch this," I said, ignoring Rocky's terse requests for me to please "proceed along the test route." I wanted to demonstrate the DSG transmission's trick clutch actuation. Yes, it is a fully automatic transmission, but it has the internals of a manual (more like two manual transmissions, and placed side-by-side, so that gear changes are handed off with the grace and speed of a baton from hand to hand) and a real, honest-to-goodness clutch and pressure plate, just like that in a row-it-yourself, three-pedal affair. But with only a gas and a brake pedal, the Jetta TDI's drivetrain management microprocessors do the work of your left foot. And they do a seamless job.
With the VW's nose pointed up the ramp, I demonstrated how brilliantly VW's DSG rests the weight of the car on the pressure plate. Just feather the go pedal, and the massive torque of the turbo four provides more than enough oomph to hold the car still while barely above idle. Or, flexing the foot further, the DSG releases the clutch fully breaking static friction and propelling the Jetta forward on a wave of torque. A true stickshift driver can feel the dance going on underhood, with the Jetta magically finding the sweet spot of the clutch every time, never bogging the engine, nor engaging too late and letting the engine rev too high. But it's done so well, and so consistently, regardless of the situation, that an automatic driver never knows the magic happening underneath and simply thinks it's a regular old automatic. But without a heat-emitting (and power-sapping) torque converter, the DSG box yields the full efficiency of a manual transmission. And with two sets of gears - 1,3, and 5 on the one side, 2,4, and 6 on the other - gear changes are startlingly quick and seamless, far better than any traditional automatic could muster. No need to de-clutch, change ratios, and engage the clutch again. The power flows seamlessly back and forth from side-to-side in the gearbox, with literally no interruption in forward progress, and none of the pushing or lurching accompanying such interruptions. The gearchanges are almost digital in nature, as witnessed by a tach needle that does not glide downward to a new RPM upon a gearchange, but rather flicks down instantly. Or flicks up instantly with a downshift. And that's the only indication, along with a change in engine note, that you're exploring a new ratio.
What a perfect match the DSG is for this new turbo. In moderate driving, it keeps the engine around 2,000 rpm and below. While driving modestly, a lot of the acceleration occurs right around the 2,000-rpm mark, making this motor seem extremely relaxed and far bigger than its 2.0 liters. in operation, it feels like a big, torquey six. I did notice that the DSG rushed to high gears so quickly at times that the engine hovered just above 1,000 rpm for extended periods, at which point there is a little bit of rumble and resonance that almost felt like lugging, and yet the engine still pulled happily with no complaint. Perhaps just a sonic kink the VW engineers haven't yet worked out, or perhaps the one concession to all of the explosive force and torque going on in each one of those half-liter chambers underhood.
On the other end of the RPM spectrum, there is nary a complaint from the 2.0. It revs happily to its 4,500-rpm redline (at least that's where the red marks start on the tach, and I didn't want to explore the fuel-cutoff point for fear that Rocky would turn full junkyard dog on me). At its top end, it is smooth, quiet, and not stressed in the least. Honestly it sounds much like a modern gasoline 16-valve engine, with perhaps just a bit more coarseness than your smoothest Honda or Toyota DOHC unit. A far, far cry from the rattling, roaring cry of my old Benz five-cylinder at high revs, or its percussive, chirping crickets idle.
But even though the TDI will rev up to 4,500, there's no point in it. The torque fun is over pretty much at 4,000 rpm, that nice shove in the back tapering off gradually and pretty much gone at by that point. But faster than you can say "boost," the DSG has swapped to the next ratio and you ride the torque wave all over again. Compared to the gasoline powerplants most of us are used to, it's counterintuitive acceleration. In this engine, less is more; less rpms equal more thrust. Wonderfully, less rpms also equals greater economy. Drive most modern gasoline engines for max thrust, and youโll be reaching for that redline in each gear, burning copious amounts of the black gold weโve taken for granted for years. Stomp the TDI's gas pedal (diesel pedal?), and youโll instantaneously leave twin rubber marks wherever it was you were idling quietly. Try that in any other four-cylinder economy sedan. Without brake-torquing. Or, in a manual, without revving high and then dumping the clutch; 236 pound-feet of easily-accessible torque is fun indeed, and itโs your ally for tire squealing shenanigans or 50 mpg cruising (so swears VW, despite EPA numbers that are not so generous).
If diesel again takes off in America as it did in the early '80s, a generation of drivers sick of paying out the nose for the American Birthright, driving, will have to make a couple of adjustments in how they are used to cars responding to their right feet. But they won't have to deal with noise. Or smoke. Or slothful acceleration. And I think plenty of drivers will be more than willing to trade high-rpm scream for enthusiastic low-rpm torque. Most especially for commuters, who rarely venture much above 3,000 rpm in their daily journeys on the clogged arteries of our major metropolitan areas, an engine that is operating at its most efficient and most powerful down low makes all the sense in the world.
We'll have to save our own impressions of the Jetta TDI's thriftiness until we can get a model to test. Volkswagen was throwing around a highway number of 50 mpg until the EPA rained on their parade, slapping the Jetta TDI with a highway rating of 40 mpg. So adamant was VW that it got an independent agency to do its own testing, and that organization arrived at a number of 44 mpg on the highway. I've noticed that all of Mercedes' new BlueTEC diesels consistently get higher mpg ratings than the EPA grants them, such as the ML 320 BlueTEC, which rates an EPA highway mileage of 24. In most real-world tests I've read, notoriously lead-footed journalists record numbers of 27 or 28 mpg highway. So perhaps VW's claims of higher mileage aren't without merit.
Of note, VW is introducing its Jetta SportWagen bodystyle along with the TDI engine option. I think the styling is a success, coming off as sexier and tidier than the slab-sided Passat Wagon. It's also more attractive than the Jetta sedan, which I find has an awkwardly high beltline and rump. Rocky claims that the wagon will outweigh the sedan by some 100 pounds, and I found that my headroom qualms were more than solved when I sat in the back of a 2.5 gasoline Jetta Sportwagen, as its roofline does not taper over the rear seat as in the sedan. Last but not least, nearly all station wagons have less aerodynamic drag than sedans, due to reduced turbulence at the rear (the late German aerodynamicist Wunibald Kamm, originator of the Kammback design found on AMC Gremlins and Toyota Priuses alike could have explained it more fully than I). So who knows, if you're an obsessed hypermiler looking for that extra 0.5 mpg...
-Colin Mathews
Have an opinion?
Repoman Posted: 8/8/2008 2:20pm PDT
08Cooper Posted: 8/10/2008 3:34pm PDT
ecogirl Posted: 8/10/2008 6:00pm PDT
JRod Posted: 8/10/2008 8:10pm PDT
There are a lot of issues there. I think the biggest reason VW will not authorize more than 20% biodiesel is because there are very few standards in place on what biodiesel is. They are very strict about engine oils, fuels etc. as it is a very sophisticated engine. I don't put bio in my TDI, because like the one dealer you talked to, I am not willing to risk my injection pump to poor fuel. If, or when, the refiners develop hard and fast specs for fuel I think VW engines will be able to run bio as well as any others.
Art Vandelay Posted: 8/11/2008 10:37am PDT
MrPolak Posted: 8/11/2008 1:51pm PDT
My '01 TDI New Beetle is currently rated at 44MPG highway, 35 city, while I get 45-50MPG in Atlanta traffic which is a mix of driving to include the not-yet-recognized category, GRIDLOCK. Despite the 18-20% premium over regular gasoline I'm still ahead in the cost-per-mile game considering that I'm getting at least 50% better mileage than a gas-powered New Beetle. This gives me at least a 30% cost advantage while consuming a smaller volume of fuel. And our oil independence is about consuming less VOLUME, isn't it? I do have to change my timing belt every 90,000 miles, sort of like my gas-burning cousins. With 175,000 on my car I still have many good miles left - thank goodness!
Harvieux Posted: 8/11/2008 2:08pm PDT
Trex Posted: 8/11/2008 2:11pm PDT
I think we've reached a critical mass with respect to energy conservation going main stream. Anyone know when we can expect to get a Golf VI diesel?
-or diesel hybrid.
Bicarbman Posted: 8/14/2008 11:14pm PDT
As for the car's ride, acceleration, handling, cabin noise level, fit, finish, interior quality, audio system, seat comfort - all exceeded my expectations. That's even though I was seriously considering a slightly used Audi A4 at about the same price. Plus, who can argue with 44+ MPG? This technology beats a battery laden hybrid hands down.
Yes, oil has come down as of late. But wait until China, Inc. fires up mid-September after the games are over. We'll not get to parity with Euoropean level pricing on auto fuel because of the tax differences but cheap petro is gone for good. TDI is viable, proven technology and has finally come to America in a modestly priced vehicle.
Simo Posted: 8/15/2008 10:36am PDT
The diesel is good but until the price of the fuel go down the math does not favor the diesel; considering the high price of maintenance, and the lack of techniciens that can fix diesel engines, add to that paying $1 extra for diesel compare to gasoline; does not make sense. The 2009 Jetta diesel have been certified by the EPA for 41 MPG at $4.70 per gal diesel, my 08 Accord get 32 MPG at $3.55 gasoline, if I add $1 gas I will be able to travel the same distance like the diesel. According to my calculation driving 12,000 miles a year, will save me only $108, considering the premium of $2000 paid up front, and this not counting if the dealer charge you more than the MSRP, because of high demand; it will take you ($2000 / 108)= 18.5 years to break even. We are far away from been country that uses diesel like Europe. And don't think about puting Bio-diesel in your engine you may endup paying more to fixe the glow injectors, or the whole engine, it's not worth it. I talk from experience, I drove the diesel in europe for long time, and I know all the ins and outs about this subject. For commuting for a short distance it's not a good idea to have diesel car, Diesel engine to be efficient require certain operating temperature. There you have it.
Dooglas Posted: 8/15/2008 5:25pm PDT
Todd Posted: 8/15/2008 11:48pm PDT
I drive 50,000 miles a year, I bought my 2005 TDI and the cost of fuel, monthly payment and Full coverage insurance is still cheaper then the fuel cost I had for my Explorer.
The Prius is as expensive if not more and has poor power and pickup. I pull my HD and trailer with the TDI when needed and still get 37 MPG at 75MPH. If I were to drive primarily in the city then the Prius would possibly be a better car. But the TDI pulls passengers and trailer weight and still gets great MPG while the Prius bogs down with 4 passengers and its Highway mileage at speed is not as good as the TDI.
As to mainteneace costs thats also a lie. My oil is changed by me for $35 every 10,000 miles, I could pay $60 at the dealer. I think my wife pays $30 for an oil change every 3,000 miles. I have no spark plugs, wired or coils to deal with. Concerning the Timing Belt ALL cars require them to be changed periodically. My wifes Miata is every 70k miles. My TDI is every 10k miles. Cost is actually very similar. Please compare vehicle to vehicle and research before telling people that the TDI is more expensive. ALL vehicles should be maintained by the manufacturers schedule and should last for a long time. The TDI is not for everyone, but it is a GREAT car for those that drive primarily highway miles! Also TDI's maintain their resale value above the comparible gas models by over $1500-2000. That pretty much negates the drivetrain cost difference.
I recommend reading http://forums.tdiclub.com for more info from owners that actually own these vehicles.
John Posted: 8/17/2008 3:08am PDT
SAM01 Posted: 8/19/2008 1:35pm PDT
I think the wise purchase at this time for long term is a midsize sedan that can get you 36 MPG like the CIVIC, or the COROLLA, or a hybrid sedan. In order for The Jetta TDI to be competitive they need to lower the MSRP, and price the TDI at the same price as the GASOLINE one. The difference in fuel prices does not encourage people to buy TDI that they never driven diesel before.
TDI Owner Posted: 8/26/2008 6:21am PDT
Tweak those figures all you want but even at a slight loss if you can figure it that way the range of a diesel between fillups and economy/power advantage is too good to pass up. Have fun at the gas station!!!!
Another TDI Owner Posted: 8/26/2008 12:25pm PDT
Another TDI Owner Posted: 8/26/2008 12:29pm PDT
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/dual-clutch-transmission.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct-Shift_Gearbox
TDI fanatic Posted: 8/28/2008 10:10am PDT
Simo Posted: 8/28/2008 1:53pm PDT
http://www.leftlanenews.com/lutz-interview-part-2-no-diesels-volt-future.html.
Dan S Posted: 9/20/2008 4:49pm PDT
The best value in new cars today when we count hybrids, diesels, compressed nat gas, and gasoline in a realistic manner, is vehicles like the Toyota Yaris or Corolla, or Honda Fit or Civic.
I own an '06 Civic EX and paid $19k new. I compared it with buying a used Jetta TDI and also the '06 Civic Hybrid and the Civic won. I almost bought the Hybrid due to tax credits then, but figured you're already paying up front for your gas mileage and you have to pay to replace the battery each time. Also, on a maintenance note, there is no timing belt change on any of the '06 to present Civics as they have a timing chain and I believe it's the same for the Fit. Compare your vehicle head to head with fuel prices today and figure in current resale values compared to buying new of your vehicle, styling, quality, maintenance costs (5k miles per basic oil change for $35 at dealer), insurance ($600/yr and I'm 39 & single with clean record), reputation, performance, and safety features (I have 6 airbags, anti-collision body structure made for crashes, transmission drops below cabin area in a frontal collision just like on Mercedes).
I really don't like that diesel costs over 20% more than gasoline in my area in the summertime and I believe this difference is even greater in winter. Diesel years ago used to cost less than gasoline in the summertime and it was a great deal for diesel owners, but not this or last year. This is the real problem with diesel as it's difficult to make up for the increased up front costs, just like hybrids. If the government would reduce taxes on diesel to promote it better, many of us would be happier.
Bob O'Donnell Posted: 10/17/2008 11:32pm PDT
I'll wait. My decisions are 10% passion, 10% confusion and 80% common sense. I'll wait until the supply is ample, that got-to-have-it demand is worn out and, perhaps the economy is bad enough that they might find it difficult to find customers. Until then I'm replacing one of sad old vehicles with a Honda Fit.
samdaneil123 Posted: 1/4/2009 10:35pm PST
"Clean diesel"
Miami VW Services Posted: 5/25/2009 8:08am PDT
"Miami VW Services"
John Posted: 5/31/2009 6:05pm PDT
Sandy Posted: 6/6/2009 10:24am PDT
Sandy in PA
David Posted: 2/20/2010 8:34pm PST
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!