2009 Volvo S60 Performance Review

May 8, 2009

PERFORMANCE | 7 out of 10

Expert Quotes:

Brakes feel strong
ConsumerGuide

unique five-cylinder howl
The Auto Channel

steering lacks feedback
Edmunds

For 2009, the S60 loses some of its sporty cachet
Cars.com

According to reviews from around the Web, the 2009 Volvo S60 falls short in smooth, rapid performance, though it does offer all-wheel drive. Car and Driver says the Haldex all-wheel-drive system on the 2.5T AWD is a boon to those driving in inclement climes—“formidable in the snow” or “snow-covered gravel and ice surfaces,” declares the reviewer.

The 2009 Volvo S60 2.5T and 2.5T AWD come standard with a light-pressure, turbocharged inline five-cylinder engine producing 208 horsepower and 236 pound-feet of torque. Standard on the T5 and optional on the two others is the high-pressure inline-five with 257 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque.

According to Car and Driver, the torque curve for both the base and higher-output varieties are pretty flat, and the horsepower figures are impressive, so acceleration remains class competitive, with a T5 yielding 0-60 times of 6.5 seconds. “But the delivery isn't as linear as it is in a naturally aspirated Audi or BMW six,” they continue, hurting the S60 in the luxury class in which it plays. Others aren’t quite as critical. “The 2.5T engine provides good acceleration and plenty of passing power,” finds Kelley Blue Book, who also feels that it works “well with the Geartronic automatic transmission,” the only transmission offered, having lost its manual option for the ’08 model year. Says Car and Driver, “refined isn't its middle name,” reminding us “this 2.5 is a transversely mounted in-line five, an inherently uncivilized layout.” The Auto Channel comments on the engine’s “unique five-cylinder howl” above 5,000 rpm.

Reviewers are unanimous about the inability of the S60’s front-wheel drive to elicit the kind of response and fun that a rear-wheel-drive chassis does. Kelley Blue Book points out one of the biggest issues associated with front-wheel drive, griping that “the high-powered T5's noticeable torque steer can, at times, become annoying.” They also malign its steering, saying it “does not feel as connected and precise as those of the BMW 3 Series or Infiniti G35.” Edmunds also feels that the “Swedish sedan's handling dynamics are a bit dull compared to newer rivals.” Of the steering, Automobile snipes that it “offers about as much feel as you'd get driving with woolly mittens.” ConsumerGuide praises the “satisfyingly solid structure,” but considers, as do others, that the ride is a bit harsh, allowing “minor road imperfections to be felt more than in most class rivals.”

ConsumerGuide says the “brakes feel strong,” and Edmunds agrees, stating they “indeed exhibit impressive stopping ability.”

Conclusion

If you are one of the BMW faithful, the 2009 Volvo S60’s peaky turbo power, lack of manual transmissions, and front-wheel-drive architecture isn’t going to sway you.

PERFORMANCE | 7 out of 10Expert Quotes:Brakes feel strongConsumerGuideunique five-cylinder howlThe Auto Channelsteering lacks feedbackEdmundsFor 2009, the S60 loses some of its sporty cachetCars.com According to reviews from around the Web, the 2009 Volvo S60 falls short in smooth, rapid performance, though it does offer all-wheel drive. Car and Driver says the Haldex all-wheel-drive system on the 2.5T AWD is a boon to those driving in inclement climes—“formidable in the snow” or “snow-covered gravel and ice surfaces,” declares the reviewer. The 2009 Volvo S60 2.5T and 2.5T AWD come standard with a light-pressure, turbocharged inline five-cylinder engine producing 208 horsepower and 236 pound-feet of torque. Standard on the T5 and optional on the two others is the high-pressure inline-five with 257 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque. According to Car and Driver, the torque curve for both the base and higher-output varieties are pretty flat, and the horsepower figures are impressive, so acceleration remains class competitive, with a T5 yielding 0-60 times of 6.5 seconds. “But the delivery isn't as linear as it is in a naturally aspirated Audi or BMW six,” they continue, hurting the S60 in the luxury class in which it plays. Others aren’t quite as critical. “The 2.5T engine provides good acceleration and plenty of passing power,” finds Kelley Blue Book, who also feels that it works “well with the Geartronic automatic transmission,” the only transmission offered, having lost its manual option for the ’08 model year. Says Car and Driver, “refined isn't its middle name,” reminding us “this 2.5 is a transversely mounted in-line five, an inherently uncivilized layout.” The Auto Channel comments on the engine’s “unique five-cylinder howl” above 5,000 rpm. Reviewers are unanimous about the inability of the S60’s front-wheel drive to elicit the kind of response and fun that a rear-wheel-drive chassis does. Kelley Blue Book points out one of the biggest issues associated with front-wheel drive, griping that “the high-powered T5's noticeable torque steer can, at times, become annoying.” They also malign its steering, saying it “does not feel as connected and precise as those of the BMW 3 Series or Infiniti G35.” Edmunds also feels that the “Swedish sedan's handling dynamics are a bit dull compared to newer rivals.” Of the steering, Automobile snipes that it “offers about as much feel as you'd get driving with woolly mittens.” ConsumerGuide praises the “satisfyingly solid structure,” but considers, as do others, that the ride is a bit harsh, allowing “minor road imperfections to be felt more than in most class rivals.” ConsumerGuide says the “brakes feel strong,” and Edmunds agrees, stating they “indeed exhibit impressive stopping ability.” ConclusionIf you are one of the BMW faithful, the 2009 Volvo S60’s peaky turbo power, lack of manual transmissions, and front-wheel-drive architecture isn’t going to sway you. 2009 VOLVO S60 STYLING | [6 out of 10] Cars.com: “businesslike dashboard groups audio and climate controls within a broad center panel” The Auto Channel: “very much an example of Swedish Modern style" Popular Mechanics: “Remember the 240? Now forget it.” Edmunds: “still sports a ...

Read More of this Review:

  1. styling
  2. performance
  3. quality
  4. safety
  5. features

Other Choices:

The 2009 S60 lands at the entry end of the mid-size sport-sedan spectrum, where a few thousand in sticker price or a slight difference in payments might make the difference. That said, it’s hard to justify the S60’s boost in price for ’09 when it now lines up with the sporty, redesigned Acura TL, which has a much roomier interior, plus plenty of technology and safety features. The Saab 9-5—from Volvo’s rival Swedish brand—is perhaps the closest competitor to the S60, but the Saab is even more outdated, with a design that reaches back a full decade. The 2009 Volvo S60 boasts better interior appointments and a better ride than the 9-5, though the (more expensive) 9-5 is more of a driver’s car—and it has a roomier backseat. The Audi A6 is another alternative; it offers either front-wheel drive or quattro all-wheel drive and has a roomy interior that feels more upscale and exhibits a nice ride, but it’s also significantly more expensive than the others. Those who want refinement and a stylish appearance, inside especially, should consider the Nissan Maxima. The new Maxima isn’t at all the sport sedan it once was, but it’s comfortable—almost opulent—inside and has some of the features of pricier lux sedans.

Next Steps:

Get a free price quote

for the 2009 Volvo S60 from a dealer near you

Check Insurance Rates

for the 2009 Volvo S60

Check Financing Rates

for the 2009 Volvo S60

Check Local Classifieds

for a 2009 Volvo S60 near you

See the Volvo S60 in Other Years:

2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001

Comments (0 total)

Be the first to post a comment

Post a comment

Post anonymously, or
(Required)
(Required - will not be published, sold or shared)
(Optional - your 'posted by' name will link to the URL)

Remember Me?

I have read TheCarConnection.com's privacy policy