2009 Smart fortwo Performance Review

April 17, 2009

PERFORMANCE | 5 out of 10

Expert Quotes:

one of the slowest new vehicles on the road
Kelley Blue Book

a dog off the dime and characterized by the most laughingly goofy gaps between shifts
Car and Driver

Doesn't turn in with the same spontaneity as a Mini Cooper
Automobile Magazine

The 2009 Smart Fortwo accelerates slowly and labors on the highway, but its frugal engine sips gas at a wallet-friendly rate that’s no better than a Toyota Prius.

Highway driving in the 2009 Smart Fortwo is a bit of an adventure, according to reviewers, and while Cars.com contends "maintaining 65 mph is within the realm of long-haul plausibility," they also note that "climbing an incline at that speed—or accelerating to anything higher—is dicey." The 2009 Smart Fortwo, in both coupe and cabriolet form, is available with just one tiny engine. Edmunds observes that a "1.0-liter three-cylinder engine that produces 71 hp and 68 pound-feet of torque" sits inside the Smart Fortwo, which is barely powerful enough to give the Smart Fortwo "a 0-60-mph time of 14.1 seconds." ConsumerGuide says that overall "acceleration is sluggish from a stop and is plagued by annoying bogging and surging at every shift." Furthermore, the Smart Fortwo's "90-mph top speed" and poor acceleration "qualify it as one of the slowest new vehicles on the road," according to Kelley Blue Book.

In reviews read by TheCarConnection.com’s editors, the only transmission available on the 2009 Smart Fortwo is universally derided. Kelley Blue Book says "the automated manual transmission" shifts "with all the grace of a backhoe," while Car and Driver remarks that the "five-speed" transmission is "a dog off the dime and characterized by the most laughingly goofy gaps between shifts" in full automatic mode. Moving to the "shift-yourself manumatic approach," Car and Driver finds that "the Fortwo can be driven more quickly, but it takes a lot of concentration." Edmunds describes the transmission as "a five-speed automanual" that "is shifted without a clutch pedal via a simple console-mounted stick (and column-mounted paddles on Passion models)."

Cars.com finds that the fuel economy "figures beat the most frugal subcompacts," though "premium fuel is recommended" for the 2009 Smart Fortwo. The EPA estimates that the 2009 Smart Fortwo will get 33 mpg in the city and 41 mpg on the highway in either coupe or cabriolet form.

Once on the highway, Kelley Blue Book reviewers discover that "the faster you go," the "more skittish the fortwo becomes." Edmunds thinks the Smart Fortwo's "high-speed stability is also pretty good, although strong crosswinds can wreak havoc on its boxy shape." They also warn that "handling largely depends on how one equips the Smart Fortwo," as "a base Pure model with manual steering and narrow 15-inch front tires feels ponderous," while "upgrading to power steering and wider tires provides a more adept driving experience, and actually makes zipping through city streets fun." Kelley Blue Book agrees, stating that they had the most fun "in parking lots, where the car's micro measurements and sub-30-foot turning circle combine to deliver an almost comical sense of agility." ConsumerGuide says that the 2009 Smart Fortwo is "stiff and choppy over all but glass-smooth roads, with sharp bumps and expansion cracks causing abrupt vertical motions."

Another performance positive is the braking on the 2009 Smart Fortwo. When it comes time to stop, Car and Driver reports that the "excellent-feeling brakes" bring the hatchback to a full stop "from 70 mph in 167 feet," with "the ragtop nine feet later."

Conclusion

The only redeeming performance quality of the 2009 Smart Fortwo is fuel economy, but even that comes at the cost of premium fuel.

PERFORMANCE | 5 out of 10Expert Quotes:one of the slowest new vehicles on the roadKelley Blue Booka dog off the dime and characterized by the most laughingly goofy gaps between shiftsCar and DriverDoesn't turn in with the same spontaneity as a Mini CooperAutomobile Magazine The 2009 Smart Fortwo accelerates slowly and labors on the highway, but its frugal engine sips gas at a wallet-friendly rate that’s no better than a Toyota Prius. Highway driving in the 2009 Smart Fortwo is a bit of an adventure, according to reviewers, and while Cars.com contends "maintaining 65 mph is within the realm of long-haul plausibility," they also note that "climbing an incline at that speed—or accelerating to anything higher—is dicey." The 2009 Smart Fortwo, in both coupe and cabriolet form, is available with just one tiny engine. Edmunds observes that a "1.0-liter three-cylinder engine that produces 71 hp and 68 pound-feet of torque" sits inside the Smart Fortwo, which is barely powerful enough to give the Smart Fortwo "a 0-60-mph time of 14.1 seconds." ConsumerGuide says that overall "acceleration is sluggish from a stop and is plagued by annoying bogging and surging at every shift." Furthermore, the Smart Fortwo's "90-mph top speed" and poor acceleration "qualify it as one of the slowest new vehicles on the road," according to Kelley Blue Book. In reviews read by TheCarConnection.com’s editors, the only transmission available on the 2009 Smart Fortwo is universally derided. Kelley Blue Book says "the automated manual transmission" shifts "with all the grace of a backhoe," while Car and Driver remarks that the "five-speed" transmission is "a dog off the dime and characterized by the most laughingly goofy gaps between shifts" in full automatic mode. Moving to the "shift-yourself manumatic approach," Car and Driver finds that "the Fortwo can be driven more quickly, but it takes a lot of concentration." Edmunds describes the transmission as "a five-speed automanual" that "is shifted without a clutch pedal via a simple console-mounted stick (and column-mounted paddles on Passion models)." Cars.com finds that the fuel economy "figures beat the most frugal subcompacts," though "premium fuel is recommended" for the 2009 Smart Fortwo. The EPA estimates that the 2009 Smart Fortwo will get 33 mpg in the city and 41 mpg on the highway in either coupe or cabriolet form. Once on the highway, Kelley Blue Book reviewers discover that "the faster you go," the "more skittish the fortwo becomes." Edmunds thinks the Smart Fortwo's "high-speed stability is also pretty good, although strong crosswinds can wreak havoc on its boxy shape." They also warn that "handling largely depends on how one equips the Smart Fortwo," as "a base Pure model with manual steering and narrow 15-inch front tires feels ponderous," while "upgrading to power steering and wider tires provides a more adept driving experience, and actually makes zipping through city streets fun." Kelley Blue Book agrees, stating that they had the most fun "in parking lots, where the car's micro measurements and sub-30-foot turning circle combine to deliver an almost comical sense of agility." ConsumerGuide says that the 2009 Smart Fortwo is "stiff and choppy over all but glass-smooth roads, with sharp bumps and expansion cracks causing abrupt vertical motions." Another performance positive is the braking on the 2009 Smart Fortwo. When it comes time to stop, Car and Driver reports that the "excellent-feeling brakes" bring the hatchback to a full stop "from 70 mph in 167 feet," with "the ragtop nine feet later." ConclusionThe only redeeming performance quality of the 2009 Smart Fortwo is fuel economy, but even that comes at the cost of premium fuel. 2009 SMART FORTWO STYLING | [7 out of 10] Kelley Blue Book: “not as quirky as the car's exterior design might lead you to expect" Automobile: "this street-legal Tonka toy is again very tall, very narrow, and very short" ConsumerGuide: "Controls are simple and well laid out" No other ...

Read More of this Review:

  1. styling
  2. performance
  3. quality
  4. safety
  5. features

Other Choices:

Hybrids like Toyota's Prius and the Honda Civic Hybrid get substantially better fuel economy than the Smart, in a much larger package, albeit at a much higher price. The Toyota Yaris, the most fuel-efficient small hatchback, with ratings of 29 mpg city, 36 mpg highway, feels downright substantial next to the Fortwo, with a real backseat and the legs for occasional distance driving, and the sprightly MINI Cooper is just as good, at 28 mpg city, 37 mpg highway. The Smart Fortwo is more fun to drive on tight, congested city streets at low speed than even the MINI Cooper. But as soon as the traffic thins out and the roads open up to the beltways and interstates, the Fortwo's cons—a hard ride, a noisy interior, the lack of power, and tense roadholding—become more serious drawbacks. Factor in the middling fuel economy of only 33 mpg city, and the "wow" factor is quickly muted.

Next Steps:

Get a free price quote

for the 2009 Smart fortwo from a dealer near you

Check Insurance Rates

for the 2009 Smart fortwo

Check Financing Rates

for the 2009 Smart fortwo

Check Local Classifieds

for a 2009 Smart fortwo near you

See the Smart fortwo in Other Years:

2010 | 2009 | 2008

Comments (0 total)

Be the first to post a comment

Post a comment

Post anonymously, or
(Required)
(Required - will not be published, sold or shared)
(Optional - your 'posted by' name will link to the URL)

Remember Me?

I have read TheCarConnection.com's privacy policy