2009 Saturn Aura Performance Review

March 16, 2009

PERFORMANCE | 8 out of 10

Expert Quotes:

Performance is much smoother and swifter with the 3.6-liter
Edmunds

handles nicely
Car and Driver

midsize sedan shines for its sporty road manners
ConsumerGuide

Capable handling from the XR
MyRide.com

Reviews from across the Web agree that the 2009 Saturn Aura exhibits good handling and road manners and has good performance all-around.

The 2009 Saturn Aura is available with four different engines: a 2.4-liter four-cylinder, a 3.5-liter V-6 for the XE, and a 3.6-liter V-6 for the XR, as well as GM’s hybrid system. The base 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine outputs 160 horsepower. The four-cylinder Aura, Car and Driver says, “is less expensive but isn’t quite as sweet as the best Japanese powerplants.”

The 3.6-liter V-6 in the Aura XR is a smooth-revving engine producing 252 horsepower and 251 pound-feet or torque that gets from 0-60 in less than 7 seconds and delivers EPA estimates of 17 mpg city, 26 mpg highway. Edmunds likes this combination the best: “Performance is much smoother and swifter with the 3.6-liter, and for consumers who aren't counting every mpg, it's the more satisfying choice.” ConsumerGuide reports its test Aura XR hit "60 mph from a stop in an impressive 6.5 seconds." They also praise the vehicle's automatic transmission, noting it is "commendably smooth and responsive." The XR transmission also has a "clutchless-manual mode and steering-wheel-mounted shift levers," says Cars.com. This combination is “superior,” Automedia remarks, and “highly recommended for Eurocar enthusiasts and those not on a tight budget.”

Steering on the Saturn Aura is rather "devoid of feel," attests Edmunds, and it hurts the car in the area of its sporting credentials. There is also no assist at low speeds, which can make parking rather intensive. Automedia, however, feels that in XR versions, “the tightly-tuned suspension and steering boost the Aura's satisfaction level right up there among the market's best front-drivers.” However, Edmunds suggests that the Saturn Aura is very capable, with minimum body roll. MyRide.com agrees, pointing out the "four-link independent rear suspension with large stabilizer bars front and rear to control body roll." Car and Driver reports that it “handles nicely.” However, reviewers at ConsumerGuide notice "some jiggle and body drumming on rippled surfaces."

According to MyRide.com, "A four-wheel-disc braking system with ABS and dynamic rear proportioning" comes standard, but the "strong and stable braking is marred by oddly dull and heavy pedal action," warns ConsumerGuide.

“In truth, the Chevy Malibu is a more fully realized version of these underpinnings,” says Car and Driver in a surprising but accurate summary of the Aura’s performance.

Conclusion

Though the four-cylinder models of the 2009 Saturn Aura are the frugal choice, the V-6 models have more satisfying performance.

PERFORMANCE | 8 out of 10Expert Quotes:Performance is much smoother and swifter with the 3.6-literEdmundshandles nicelyCar and Drivermidsize sedan shines for its sporty road mannersConsumerGuideCapable handling from the XRMyRide.com Reviews from across the Web agree that the 2009 Saturn Aura exhibits good handling and road manners and has good performance all-around. The 2009 Saturn Aura is available with four different engines: a 2.4-liter four-cylinder, a 3.5-liter V-6 for the XE, and a 3.6-liter V-6 for the XR, as well as GM’s hybrid system. The base 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine outputs 160 horsepower. The four-cylinder Aura, Car and Driver says, “is less expensive but isn’t quite as sweet as the best Japanese powerplants.” The 3.6-liter V-6 in the Aura XR is a smooth-revving engine producing 252 horsepower and 251 pound-feet or torque that gets from 0-60 in less than 7 seconds and delivers EPA estimates of 17 mpg city, 26 mpg highway. Edmunds likes this combination the best: “Performance is much smoother and swifter with the 3.6-liter, and for consumers who aren't counting every mpg, it's the more satisfying choice.” ConsumerGuide reports its test Aura XR hit "60 mph from a stop in an impressive 6.5 seconds." They also praise the vehicle's automatic transmission, noting it is "commendably smooth and responsive." The XR transmission also has a "clutchless-manual mode and steering-wheel-mounted shift levers," says Cars.com. This combination is “superior,” Automedia remarks, and “highly recommended for Eurocar enthusiasts and those not on a tight budget.” Steering on the Saturn Aura is rather "devoid of feel," attests Edmunds, and it hurts the car in the area of its sporting credentials. There is also no assist at low speeds, which can make parking rather intensive. Automedia, however, feels that in XR versions, “the tightly-tuned suspension and steering boost the Aura's satisfaction level right up there among the market's best front-drivers.” However, Edmunds suggests that the Saturn Aura is very capable, with minimum body roll. MyRide.com agrees, pointing out the "four-link independent rear suspension with large stabilizer bars front and rear to control body roll." Car and Driver reports that it “handles nicely.” However, reviewers at ConsumerGuide notice "some jiggle and body drumming on rippled surfaces." According to MyRide.com, "A four-wheel-disc braking system with ABS and dynamic rear proportioning" comes standard, but the "strong and stable braking is marred by oddly dull and heavy pedal action," warns ConsumerGuide. “In truth, the Chevy Malibu is a more fully realized version of these underpinnings,” says Car and Driver in a surprising but accurate summary of the Aura’s performance. ConclusionThough the four-cylinder models of the 2009 Saturn Aura are the frugal choice, the V-6 models have more satisfying performance. 2009 SATURN AURA STYLING | [8 out of 10] Car and Driver: "fine-looking mid-size family sedan” ConsumerGuide: "mostly handy and intuitive" controls Edmunds: "the 2009 Saturn Aura is a well-rounded midsize sedan with sufficient levels of style" According to TheCarConnection.com's ...

Read More of this Review:

  1. styling
  2. performance
  3. quality
  4. safety
  5. features

Other Choices:

The Volkswagen Passat is in the same size class as the 2009 Saturn Aura and offers a tightly constructed cabin with a great look and feel. Head-to-head, the 2009 Aura is decidedly sportier in feel than the Hyundai Sonata or the Toyota Camry, more along the lines of the Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, and Ford Fusion. While the sophistication of the Hyundai Sonata has improved dramatically, it is not quite the equal of the Aura. The Toyota Camry is the sales leader in this class. The latest Camry, introduced in 2007 alongside the Saturn Aura, has its merits, but also its faults. There are quality issues with this Toyota; to keep costs down, the interior of this generation of Camry exhibits some inexpensive-looking pieces.

Next Steps:

Get a free price quote

for the 2009 Saturn Aura from a dealer near you

Check Insurance Rates

for the 2009 Saturn Aura

Check Financing Rates

for the 2009 Saturn Aura

Check Local Classifieds

for a 2009 Saturn Aura near you

See the Saturn Aura in Other Years:

2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006

Comments (0 total)

Be the first to post a comment

Post a comment

Post anonymously, or
(Required)
(Required - will not be published, sold or shared)
(Optional - your 'posted by' name will link to the URL)

Remember Me?

I have read TheCarConnection.com's privacy policy