2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK Class Performance Review

October 30, 2008

PERFORMANCE | 9 out of 10

Expert Quotes:

Direct-steer setup works beautifully and easily unwound the brutal (and fun) hairpin switchbacks
Popular Mechanics

A compliant ride even on rough roads
Cars.com

Speed lovers of all stripes will be intrigued by the midlevel SLK350's newly pumped-up engine
Edmunds

Through the use of some obscure automotive witchcraft, the engineers at Mercedes-Benz have managed to improve the performance and power output of the 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class lineup, while also increasing fuel efficiency in the process. The result is an improved driving experience over the already-exhilarating 2008 SLK-Class.

The 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class comes in three flavors, all of which move quickly thanks to either V-6 or V-8 engines. Edmunds reviewers report that "under the SLK300's hood is a 3.0-liter V6 that makes 228 hp and 221 lb-ft of torque," while "the SLK350 packs a 3.5-liter V6 good for 300 hp and 265 lb-ft of torque," and the uber-quick "SLK55 AMG comes with a beastly 5.4-liter V8 that cranks out 355 hp and 376 lb-ft of torque." Motor Trend observes that some of the changes for this 2009 Mercedes-Benz include "lighter pistons, stronger valves, and conical valve springs, as well as a redesigned intake manifold and higher compression ratio (11.7:1 versus 10.7:1)." Reviews read by TheCarConnection.com show that all Mercedes-Benz 2009 SLK models get off the line quickly, and Edmunds claims that "even the base SLK300 provides sprightly acceleration." Car and Driver reviewers state that their last SLK350 "ran from 0 to 60 in 5.4 seconds," and "the additional 32 horses" in the Mercedes-Benz 2009 SLK350 "should knock a few 10ths off that time."

Most versions of the 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class feature a Mercedes-Benz "seven-speed automatic transmission with manual shift control," but Edmunds notes "the SLK300 can be had with either a six-speed manual" or the aforementioned auto. Reviews read by TheCarConnection.com hold significant praise for the automatic, which Car and Driver calls simply "excellent." Cars.com also gives high marks for the "smooth shifts that can't be felt most of the time." However, reviewers also love the six-speed manual, which offers a more interactive driving experience, and they agree with Popular Mechanics, which comments that "a six-speed manual gearbox is available—but only in the SLK300 model. Bummer."

As mentioned earlier, the Mercedes-Benz 2009 SLK-Class offers surprisingly good fuel economy, at least for the level of performance the engines deliver. The EPA estimates that the SLK300 will get 17 mpg city and 26 mpg highway with the manual transmission, while the automatic ups those numbers to 19 mpg city, 26 mpg highway. The Mercedes-Benz SLK350 gets 18 mpg city and 26 mpg on the highway, while the SLK55 AMG's two extra cylinders drop the fuel economy to 14 mpg city and 22 mpg highway. However, some reviews read by TheCarConnection.com show that the real-life numbers might be even better than those cited by the EPA; in a Cars.com road test of "about 150 miles of mostly highway driving," they found that "the SLK350 averaged 29 mpg."

One thing that the Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class was maligned for in previous years was that it offered tons of class and style, but lagged behind its competitors in terms of driving excitement. Fortunately, Edmunds reviewers report that "when the folks at Mercedes set about redesigning the SLK a few years ago, they had evidently grown tired of playing second fiddle to their Bavarian rival in the minds of discerning drivers." The result is a capable performance convertible that, as Cars.com declares, "proves to be a decent touring car" as well. Popular Mechanics says that "a new, all-mechanical direct-steer system tightens the steering ratio when the wheel is turned a mere 5 degrees off-center," which improves overall handling significantly when combined with the "speed-sensitive power assist."

The 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK lineup also boasts "large disc brakes" that do an admirable job of scrubbing off excess speed in a hurry, according to J.D. Power.

Conclusion

With some mechanical improvements for 2009, the SLK is both satisfying to drive and frugal.

PERFORMANCE | 9 out of 10Expert Quotes:Direct-steer setup works beautifully and easily unwound the brutal (and fun) hairpin switchbacksPopular MechanicsA compliant ride even on rough roadsCars.comSpeed lovers of all stripes will be intrigued by the midlevel SLK350's newly pumped-up engineEdmunds Through the use of some obscure automotive witchcraft, the engineers at Mercedes-Benz have managed to improve the performance and power output of the 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class lineup, while also increasing fuel efficiency in the process. The result is an improved driving experience over the already-exhilarating 2008 SLK-Class. The 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class comes in three flavors, all of which move quickly thanks to either V-6 or V-8 engines. Edmunds reviewers report that "under the SLK300's hood is a 3.0-liter V6 that makes 228 hp and 221 lb-ft of torque," while "the SLK350 packs a 3.5-liter V6 good for 300 hp and 265 lb-ft of torque," and the uber-quick "SLK55 AMG comes with a beastly 5.4-liter V8 that cranks out 355 hp and 376 lb-ft of torque." Motor Trend observes that some of the changes for this 2009 Mercedes-Benz include "lighter pistons, stronger valves, and conical valve springs, as well as a redesigned intake manifold and higher compression ratio (11.7:1 versus 10.7:1)." Reviews read by TheCarConnection.com show that all Mercedes-Benz 2009 SLK models get off the line quickly, and Edmunds claims that "even the base SLK300 provides sprightly acceleration." Car and Driver reviewers state that their last SLK350 "ran from 0 to 60 in 5.4 seconds," and "the additional 32 horses" in the Mercedes-Benz 2009 SLK350 "should knock a few 10ths off that time." Most versions of the 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class feature a Mercedes-Benz "seven-speed automatic transmission with manual shift control," but Edmunds notes "the SLK300 can be had with either a six-speed manual" or the aforementioned auto. Reviews read by TheCarConnection.com hold significant praise for the automatic, which Car and Driver calls simply "excellent." Cars.com also gives high marks for the "smooth shifts that can't be felt most of the time." However, reviewers also love the six-speed manual, which offers a more interactive driving experience, and they agree with Popular Mechanics, which comments that "a six-speed manual gearbox is available—but only in the SLK300 model. Bummer." As mentioned earlier, the Mercedes-Benz 2009 SLK-Class offers surprisingly good fuel economy, at least for the level of performance the engines deliver. The EPA estimates that the SLK300 will get 17 mpg city and 26 mpg highway with the manual transmission, while the automatic ups those numbers to 19 mpg city, 26 mpg highway. The Mercedes-Benz SLK350 gets 18 mpg city and 26 mpg on the highway, while the SLK55 AMG's two extra cylinders drop the fuel economy to 14 mpg city and 22 mpg highway. However, some reviews read by TheCarConnection.com show that the real-life numbers might be even better than those cited by the EPA; in a Cars.com road test of "about 150 miles of mostly highway driving," they found that "the SLK350 averaged 29 mpg." One thing that the Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class was maligned for in previous years was that it offered tons of class and style, but lagged behind its competitors in terms of driving excitement. Fortunately, Edmunds reviewers report that "when the folks at Mercedes set about redesigning the SLK a few years ago, they had evidently grown tired of playing second fiddle to their Bavarian rival in the minds of discerning drivers." The result is a capable performance convertible that, as Cars.com declares, "proves to be a decent touring car" as well. Popular Mechanics says that "a new, all-mechanical direct-steer system tightens the steering ratio when the wheel is turned a mere 5 degrees off-center," which improves overall handling significantly when combined with the "speed-sensitive power assist." The 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK lineup also boasts "large disc brakes" that do an admirable job of scrubbing off excess speed in a hurry, according to J.D. Power. ConclusionWith some mechanical improvements for 2009, the SLK is both satisfying to drive and frugal. 2009 MERCEDES-BENZ SLK STYLING | [8 out of 10] Car and Driver: "Very, very similar to models that cost three times as much" Cars.com: "An appropriately luxurious look that takes key elements from other, more expensive Mercedes-Benz models" Motor Trend: "For 2009, all models get new ...

Read More of this Review:

  1. styling
  2. performance
  3. quality
  4. safety
  5. features

Other Choices:

The 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class remains closely comparable to rival small roadsters from BMW and Porsche, the Z4 and Boxster, which all offer strong acceleration and premium features, though forgoing some of the simplicity and lightness in the process. If a simpler, more traditional roadster for weekend top-down driving is what you seek, you may be happier with the back-to-basics Miata. However, if you plan to drive the roadster every day, the SLK is perhaps the top choice due to its excellent retractable hardtop, which seals out the weather and even road and wind noise. The soft tops available for the Z4 and Boxster are no match, though they don't compromise trunk space as the SLK's setup does. The Z4 offers a distinctly different style, with swoopier sheetmetal, while the Boxster remains the top choice for those craving a purer sportscar experience, though its interior isn't quite up to the standards of the others. The TT is nimbler and more maneuverable for city driving, but its interior isn't as spacious and comfortable as the SLK's. The SLK remains among the most refined and smoothest-riding of the roadsters, and this year's changes promise to make it even more enjoyable to drive.

Next Steps:

Get a free price quote

for the 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK Class from a dealer near you

Check Insurance Rates

for the 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK Class

Check Financing Rates

for the 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK Class

Check Local Classifieds

for a 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK Class near you

See the Mercedes-Benz SLK Class in Other Years:

2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998

Comments (1 total)

  1. By Hank Greenberg #1, Posted: 10/4/2009

    I have a brand new slk350 that is four weeks old. I placed a cup of coffee in the cup holder which sits directly above the GPS system. I was on a bumpy road and a small amount of coffee dripped out of the hole in the coffee lid and somehow went into the GPS system and "fried" the system boards. MB wants $6,000 to replace because the GPS was not defective. I agree that there is no defect with the system. The defect is in the design. You cannot place liquids over sensative electrical systems unless you build a shield that will prevent such an event to occur. I have discussed this with senior mechanical engineers at BU and they said the design is "an accident ready to happen"
    How do I get MB to own up to there bad design so I don't get stuck with these humungus charge on a car that has less than 1,000 miles on it?

Post a comment

Post anonymously, or
(Required)
(Required - will not be published, sold or shared)
(Optional - your 'posted by' name will link to the URL)

Remember Me?

I have read TheCarConnection.com's privacy policy