2010 GMC Canyon Performance Review

August 25, 2009

PERFORMANCE | 7 out of 10

Expert Quotes:

These trucks trail the competition in every way
Car and Driver

The [V-8] Canyon mainly hauled ass
Automobile Magazine

Acceleration and hauling performance is lackluster
Edmunds

Last year GMC increased the fuel economy of the four- and five-cylinder engines offered in the Canyon, but the big news was the availability of a V-8 option, which returns for the 2010 model.

“Even though this engine lacks overhead camshafts and four valves per cylinder, it delivers a potent 300 horsepower at 5,200 rpm and 320 pound-feet of torque at 4,000 rpm,” says Automotive.com, adding, “The Canyon mainly hauled ass, although it also endured more than a 100 miles of boat towing in the dead of winter without whining.” TheCarConnection.com has confirmed the torquey, relaxed appeal of the V-8 Canyon and finds it much more appealing than the four- and five-cylinder engines otherwise offered.

Reviewers fail to find much, if anything, to love from the standard 2.9-liter inline four-cylinder engine (185 horsepower) or the optional inline five-cylinder unit (242 horsepower). ConsumerGuide feels that the Canyon GMC's four-cylinder offers "adequate power for around-town driving," but Edmunds notes that the smaller engine reduces the maximum towing capacity to 4,000 pounds, which "is below average for this type of truck." Car and Driver agrees, decrying the Canyon’s smaller engines as "thrashy" and claiming that "these trucks trail the competition in every way."

In terms of the ride quality, “on the highway, the Canyon feels solid and stable, with a smooth, comfortable ride,” says MyRide.com. But Car and Driver is critical once again, this time griping that the "steering is high-effort with a numb feel"—echoing the observations of TheCarConnection.com’s editors. On a positive note, the brakes are impressive and ConsumerGuide agrees that the brakes provide "quick, even stops with good pedal feel."

Automobile Magazine tests a 2010 GMC Canyon with the retuned, high-performance ZQ8 suspension/package and states that “the steering response is rapid and accurate, yet the ride is supple, even over Michigan's bombed-out excuse for pavement. The lack of steering feel will surely disappoint BMW worshippers, but a ZQ8-fortified Canyon is about as good as trucks get.” This suspension package is now available on even more variants of the Canyon for 2010.

Concerning the Canyon’s drivetrains, Cars.com says the GMC Canyon is "available with rear- or four-wheel drive" and a "choice of three rear axle ratios." Reviews of the transmissions read by TheCarConnection.com lean toward the positive end of the spectrum, and ConsumerGuide reviewers love the "quick-shifting automatic transmission." Edmunds agrees, claiming that the four-speed automatic's "shifts are smooth and well-timed,” adding that "a five-speed manual transmission [is] standard on most four-cylinder Canyons" and a "four-speed automatic is standard on five-cylinder trucks and optional with the smaller engine."

In terms of fuel economy, the official EPA estimates for the Canyon GMC range up to 25 mpg highway for four-cylinder models. Two-wheel-drive Crew Cabs with the five-cylinder engine can return 16 mpg city, 22 highway, as can manual-transmission Regular Cabs with the four-cylinder engine. The V-8 model is rated lower, at 14 mpg city, 19 highway, but TheCarConnection.com observes nearly 18 mpg in enthusiastic driving, indicating that drivers are likely to see reasonably good mileage thanks to the Canyon's relaxed, unstressed demeanor.

Conclusion

The 5.3-liter V-8 places the 2010 GMC Canyon in a more competitive position, and the uprated suspension setup available on some models improves steering and ride quality.

PERFORMANCE | 7 out of 10Expert Quotes:These trucks trail the competition in every wayCar and DriverThe [V-8] Canyon mainly hauled assAutomobile MagazineAcceleration and hauling performance is lacklusterEdmunds Last year GMC increased the fuel economy of the four- and five-cylinder engines offered in the Canyon, but the big news was the availability of a V-8 option, which returns for the 2010 model. “Even though this engine lacks overhead camshafts and four valves per cylinder, it delivers a potent 300 horsepower at 5,200 rpm and 320 pound-feet of torque at 4,000 rpm,” says Automotive.com, adding, “The Canyon mainly hauled ass, although it also endured more than a 100 miles of boat towing in the dead of winter without whining.” TheCarConnection.com has confirmed the torquey, relaxed appeal of the V-8 Canyon and finds it much more appealing than the four- and five-cylinder engines otherwise offered. Reviewers fail to find much, if anything, to love from the standard 2.9-liter inline four-cylinder engine (185 horsepower) or the optional inline five-cylinder unit (242 horsepower). ConsumerGuide feels that the Canyon GMC's four-cylinder offers "adequate power for around-town driving," but Edmunds notes that the smaller engine reduces the maximum towing capacity to 4,000 pounds, which "is below average for this type of truck." Car and Driver agrees, decrying the Canyon’s smaller engines as "thrashy" and claiming that "these trucks trail the competition in every way." In terms of the ride quality, “on the highway, the Canyon feels solid and stable, with a smooth, comfortable ride,” says MyRide.com. But Car and Driver is critical once again, this time griping that the "steering is high-effort with a numb feel"—echoing the observations of TheCarConnection.com’s editors. On a positive note, the brakes are impressive and ConsumerGuide agrees that the brakes provide "quick, even stops with good pedal feel." Automobile Magazine tests a 2010 GMC Canyon with the retuned, high-performance ZQ8 suspension/package and states that “the steering response is rapid and accurate, yet the ride is supple, even over Michigan's bombed-out excuse for pavement. The lack of steering feel will surely disappoint BMW worshippers, but a ZQ8-fortified Canyon is about as good as trucks get.” This suspension package is now available on even more variants of the Canyon for 2010. Concerning the Canyon’s drivetrains, Cars.com says the GMC Canyon is "available with rear- or four-wheel drive" and a "choice of three rear axle ratios." Reviews of the transmissions read by TheCarConnection.com lean toward the positive end of the spectrum, and ConsumerGuide reviewers love the "quick-shifting automatic transmission." Edmunds agrees, claiming that the four-speed automatic's "shifts are smooth and well-timed,” adding that "a five-speed manual transmission [is] standard on most four-cylinder Canyons" and a "four-speed automatic is standard on five-cylinder trucks and optional with the smaller engine." In terms of fuel economy, the official EPA estimates for the Canyon GMC range up to 25 mpg highway for four-cylinder models. Two-wheel-drive Crew Cabs with the five-cylinder engine can return 16 mpg city, 22 highway, as can manual-transmission Regular Cabs with the four-cylinder engine. The V-8 model is rated lower, at 14 mpg city, 19 highway, but TheCarConnection.com observes nearly 18 mpg in enthusiastic driving, indicating that drivers are likely to see reasonably good mileage thanks to the Canyon's relaxed, unstressed demeanor. ConclusionThe 5.3-liter V-8 places the 2010 GMC Canyon in a more competitive position, and the uprated suspension setup available on some models improves steering and ride quality. 2010 GMC CANYON STYLING | [6 out of 10] Cars.com: "an athletic silhouette" MyRide.com: "looks mean and menacing, albeit in a classy GMC manner" Car and Driver: "A broad variety of body styles, wheelbase and cargo-bed lengths" First introduced in 2004, the new Canyon essentially has ...

Read More of this Review:

  1. styling
  2. performance
  3. quality
  4. safety
  5. features

Other Choices:

The Chevrolet Colorado is very close to the Canyon in almost every aspect—except for unique grilles and subtle variations in badging and trim. The Ford Ranger reigns as the strongest competitor to the Canyon and Colorado; the Ranger is an aging design, but at the four-cylinder level it’s more enjoyable to drive than the GM twins and gets decent fuel economy. The Ranger also comes in a wide range of configurations—including strong V-6 versions, although it doesn’t compete with the new V-8. The Toyota Tacoma is a step larger, but it gives the Canyon a run for the money, as its base price is more than $1,000 lower, with strong, smooth performance from its standard four-cylinder engine and hearty, competitive hauling power from its optional V-6. The Tacoma also has especially solid resale value. The Nissan Frontier feels larger, though it comes with a base four-cylinder engine as well or an exceptionally torquey and smooth 3.5-liter V-6. The Dakota is another alternative, but in terms of size it’s just short of full-size trucks; it’s not as maneuverable and gets less-than-stellar fuel economy from its V-6 and V-8 engines.

Next Steps:

Get a free price quote

for the 2010 GMC Canyon from a dealer near you

Check Insurance Rates

for the 2010 GMC Canyon

Check Financing Rates

for the 2010 GMC Canyon

Check Local Classifieds

for a 2010 GMC Canyon near you

See the GMC Canyon in Other Years:

2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004

Comments (1 total)

  1. By  Auto Loans #1, Posted: 8/26/2009

    If you want to get a car, and you don't have a huge amount of cash lying around, then you are going to need auto loans. Just about anyone – unless you mean some rotten trust fund baby bogus rich kid that should be shot out of a cannon – gets auto loans for a used car or new car at some point, and getting auto loan financing on non-usurious terms might take a little negotiation, especially if you need a bad credit car loan. It isn't easy with the megabanks, especially since they don't know how to manage their real estate investments. So you have to be creative, and find other avenues to borrow money for >auto loans.

Post a comment

Post anonymously, or
(Required)
(Required - will not be published, sold or shared)
(Optional - your 'posted by' name will link to the URL)

Remember Me?

I have read TheCarConnection.com's privacy policy