2008 GMC Canyon Performance Review

November 5, 2008

PERFORMANCE | 6 out of 10

Expert Quotes:

Brakes provide quick, even stops with good pedal feel
ConsumerGuide

Acceleration and hauling performance is lackluster
Edmunds

These trucks trail the competition in every way
Car and Driver

We may never know whether the GM decision-makers were more interested in cutting costs or increasing fuel economy on the 2008 GMC Canyon, but either way, they unfortunately chose to offer a pair of underpowered engines that provide disappointing performance.

GMC offers two engines for the 2008 GMC Canyon lineup, but neither is very exciting. Edmunds states that "the standard 2.9-liter four-cylinder makes 185 horsepower and 190 pound-feet of torque," while the "optional 3.7-liter inline five-cylinder produces 242 hp and 242 lb-ft of torque." ConsumerGuide feels that the Canyon GMC's four-cylinder offers "adequate power for around-town driving." However, in comparison to the competition, Edmunds says "the Canyon's engines can't match the power and performance of the V-6s and V-8s offered by the competition." Car and Driver reviewers agree, decrying the "thrashy engine" on the GMC Canyon and claiming that "these trucks trail the competition in every way."

In terms of work capabilities, the GMC Canyon falls short as well. The smaller engine reduces the maximum towing capacity to 4,000 pounds. Edmunds points out that this "is below average for this type of truck."

The 2008 GMC Canyon is available with several different transmission options, and Edmunds notes that these include either "a five-speed manual transmission [that] is standard on most four-cylinder Canyons" and a "four-speed automatic that is standard on five-cylinder trucks and optional with the smaller engine." In addition, Cars.com says the 2008 GMC Canyon is "available with rear- or four-wheel drive" and a "choice of three rear axle ratios." Reviews of the transmissions read by TheCarConnection.com trend toward the positive end of the spectrum, and ConsumerGuide reviewers love the "quick-shifting automatic transmission." Edmunds agrees, claiming that the four-speed automatic's "shifts are smooth and well-timed."

Despite having just four or five gears to choose from, the 2008 GMC Canyon makes the most of them when it comes to fuel economy. The official EPA estimates for the Canyon GMC are 15 mpg city, 20 mpg highway for the 4WD Crew Cab, while four-cylinder Crew Cabs should get 18 mpg city, 24 mpg highway. Two-wheel-drive Crew Cabs with the five-cylinder engine can return 16 mpg city, 22 mpg highway, as can manual-transmission Regular Cabs with the four-cylinder engine. Rounding out the 2008 GMC Canyon lineup are the 4WD Regular Cab with the four-cylinder and an automatic transmission at 17/22 mpg, as well as the Regular Cab with the five-cylinder and automatic at 15/21 mpg.

Most reviewers say little about the Canyon’s handling, but Car and Driver is turned off, griping that the "steering is high-effort with a numb feel." Fortunately, the 2008 GMC Canyon redeems itself with its good braking performance, which ConsumerGuide says makes for "quick, even stops with good pedal feel."

Conclusion

Lackluster performance is somewhat offset by the above-average (four-cylinder) fuel economy on the 2008 GMC Canyon.

PERFORMANCE | 6 out of 10Expert Quotes:Brakes provide quick, even stops with good pedal feelConsumerGuideAcceleration and hauling performance is lacklusterEdmundsThese trucks trail the competition in every wayCar and Driver We may never know whether the GM decision-makers were more interested in cutting costs or increasing fuel economy on the 2008 GMC Canyon, but either way, they unfortunately chose to offer a pair of underpowered engines that provide disappointing performance. GMC offers two engines for the 2008 GMC Canyon lineup, but neither is very exciting. Edmunds states that "the standard 2.9-liter four-cylinder makes 185 horsepower and 190 pound-feet of torque," while the "optional 3.7-liter inline five-cylinder produces 242 hp and 242 lb-ft of torque." ConsumerGuide feels that the Canyon GMC's four-cylinder offers "adequate power for around-town driving." However, in comparison to the competition, Edmunds says "the Canyon's engines can't match the power and performance of the V-6s and V-8s offered by the competition." Car and Driver reviewers agree, decrying the "thrashy engine" on the GMC Canyon and claiming that "these trucks trail the competition in every way." In terms of work capabilities, the GMC Canyon falls short as well. The smaller engine reduces the maximum towing capacity to 4,000 pounds. Edmunds points out that this "is below average for this type of truck." The 2008 GMC Canyon is available with several different transmission options, and Edmunds notes that these include either "a five-speed manual transmission [that] is standard on most four-cylinder Canyons" and a "four-speed automatic that is standard on five-cylinder trucks and optional with the smaller engine." In addition, Cars.com says the 2008 GMC Canyon is "available with rear- or four-wheel drive" and a "choice of three rear axle ratios." Reviews of the transmissions read by TheCarConnection.com trend toward the positive end of the spectrum, and ConsumerGuide reviewers love the "quick-shifting automatic transmission." Edmunds agrees, claiming that the four-speed automatic's "shifts are smooth and well-timed." Despite having just four or five gears to choose from, the 2008 GMC Canyon makes the most of them when it comes to fuel economy. The official EPA estimates for the Canyon GMC are 15 mpg city, 20 mpg highway for the 4WD Crew Cab, while four-cylinder Crew Cabs should get 18 mpg city, 24 mpg highway. Two-wheel-drive Crew Cabs with the five-cylinder engine can return 16 mpg city, 22 mpg highway, as can manual-transmission Regular Cabs with the four-cylinder engine. Rounding out the 2008 GMC Canyon lineup are the 4WD Regular Cab with the four-cylinder and an automatic transmission at 17/22 mpg, as well as the Regular Cab with the five-cylinder and automatic at 15/21 mpg. Most reviewers say little about the Canyon’s handling, but Car and Driver is turned off, griping that the "steering is high-effort with a numb feel." Fortunately, the 2008 GMC Canyon redeems itself with its good braking performance, which ConsumerGuide says makes for "quick, even stops with good pedal feel." ConclusionLackluster performance is somewhat offset by the above-average (four-cylinder) fuel economy on the 2008 GMC Canyon. 2008 GMC CANYON STYLING | [6 out of 10] Edmunds: "Distinctively rugged styling" Kelley Blue Book: "Interior layout is highly functional" Car and Driver: "A broad variety of body styles, wheelbase and cargo-bed lengths" A large part of any pickup truck's appeal is its macho exterior ...

Read More of this Review:

  1. styling
  2. performance
  3. quality
  4. safety
  5. features

Other Choices:

The Canyon shares its running gear with the Chevrolet Colorado, which you may find more attractive -- otherwise, the two are near-twins. The true competitor for the Canyon/Colorado is the Ford Ranger, an aging truck that still scores well in crash tests, gets decent fuel economy and comes in all sorts of flavors. Larger trucks like the Dodge Dakota, Nissan Frontier and Toyota Tacoma are a distinct size larger, and have four-cylinder engines that aren’t quite as frugal as that in the 2008 GMC Canyon.

Next Steps:

Check Insurance Rates

for the 2008 GMC Canyon

Check Financing Rates

for the 2008 GMC Canyon

Check Local Classifieds

for a 2008 GMC Canyon near you

See the GMC Canyon in Other Years:

2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004

Comments (1 total)

  1. By Mark #1, Posted: 3/4/2009

    Review scum by Edmunds and CarAndDriver

    Just a little history on allegedly underpowered 3.7l Canyon.Only road tests -comparisons between Canyon and competed compact pick-up trucks took place in 2005.Two major road tests were done by Edmunds and CarAndDriver.Performance data was published, impressions made and opinions formed.Since then they simply carryover their reviews from one year to another up to date. In 2007 GMC came up with bigger , stronger and updated engine. Since Canyon quite frankly is not up to competition with neither Nissan nor Toyota amd it is still essentially the same vehicle just with bigger engine, Edmunds and CarAndDriver simply decided ignore that fact.
    Yoy make take you calculator and go to 2005 test small pickup trucks performance data posted at Edmunds, and estimate Canyon performance with a new engine.Very conservatively speaking Canyon should be able to compete with Frontier and Tacoma. Only reliable information regarding measurable performance 3.7l Canyon, I found, is coming from TruckTestDigest at GulfCoastNews.com Comparable Tacoma and Canyon tested by the same team on drivers on the same track showed identical results for 1/4 mile and Tacoma being minimally faster at 0-60 test. It is worthy of mentioning that at 0-60 test Canyon lost slightly only because of significant wheel-hop and there was potential to go much faster (according to drivers testimony). So , actually was not Tacoma stronger engine but Tacoma technical superiority over Canyon.Many smaller car reviewers from all over the web copy and paste Edmunds opinions without even being aware that this information is somehow outdated.No major comparison tests were ever done between 3.7l Canyon and competition so there is no substantial proof that Canyon engine is any weaker that these of competition. Also is worthy of mentioning that driving impression and measurable performance are two different things in this regard Canyon is far behind Frontier and Tacoma.

Post a comment

Post anonymously, or
(Required)
(Required - will not be published, sold or shared)
(Optional - your 'posted by' name will link to the URL)

Remember Me?

I have read TheCarConnection.com's privacy policy