SAFETY | 5 out of 10
Expert Quotes:
Acceptable," front-impact; "marginal," side impact; "poor," rear-impact rating
IIHS
Four stars for front-impact protection
NHTSA
The 2009 Ford Ranger doesn't provide a clean sweep of top-notch safety gear, but TheCarConnection.com finds it earns mostly acceptable crash-test scores.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) gave the 2009 Ford Ranger "acceptable" and "poor" ratings for frontal and rear impacts, respectively, in its assessments.
Side impact tests resulted in a "marginal" rating. According to Edmunds, in National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) crash-test ratings, the 2009 Ford Ranger "earned four out of five stars for driver and front-passenger protection in frontal impacts."
Anti-lock brakes are standard on the 2009 Ford Ranger, but the Ranger shows its advancing age in its lack of side and curtain airbags. Electronic stability control—an especially important feature on rollover-prone pickups—isn't offered either.
Conclusion
The 2009 Ford Ranger shows its age here, with the lack of several key safety features and a lackluster crash-test record.
SAFETY | 5 out of 10Expert Quotes:Acceptable," front-impact; "marginal," side impact; "poor," rear-impact ratingIIHSFour stars for front-impact protectionNHTSA
The 2009 Ford Ranger doesn't provide a clean sweep of top-notch safety gear, but TheCarConnection.com finds it earns mostly acceptable crash-test scores.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) gave the 2009 Ford Ranger "acceptable" and "poor" ratings for frontal and rear impacts, respectively, in its assessments.
Side impact tests resulted in a "marginal" rating. According to Edmunds, in National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) crash-test ratings, the 2009 Ford Ranger "earned four out of five stars for driver and front-passenger protection in frontal impacts."
Anti-lock brakes are standard on the 2009 Ford Ranger, but the Ranger shows its advancing age in its lack of side and curtain airbags. Electronic stability control—an especially important feature on rollover-prone pickups—isn't offered either.
ConclusionThe 2009 Ford Ranger shows its age here, with the lack of several key safety features and a lackluster crash-test record.
2009 FORD RANGER STYLING | [6 out of 10] Edmunds: "due to its aged design, it falls short in many other areas, making just about any other small or midsize pickup a better choice" MyRide.com: "truck desperately needs an update" ConsumerGuide: "basic design is more than a decade old and ...
Comments (1 total)
By Doug lampman #1, Posted: 9/19/2009
The ranger should not be compared to the Colorado the price offered after Ford incentives was $5000 cheaper. The ranger is less truck then the GM but they have no 4 cyl. trucks the perfect inexpensive comfortable 200,000 mile truck. I drive it to work on week days the Kids use it on week ends.
Post a comment