2009 Cadillac SRX Performance Review

February 23, 2009

PERFORMANCE | 7 out of 10

Expert Quotes:

V-6 engine is merely adequate
Car and Driver

SRX feels lighter and more nimble than you'd expect
Autoblog

viable alternative to a full-size SUV
Kelley Blue Book

As sporting to drive as some performance-minded sedans
MyRide.com

The 2009 Cadillac SRX handles surprisingly well for an SUV, and with the Magnetic Ride Control option, you’ll quickly forget that you are piloting a taller vehicle.

The 2009 SRX comes with a 3.6-liter, 260-horsepower V-6 as the standard engine teamed with a five-speed automatic. This is the price leader, but it won’t satisfy your needs if you are looking for performance, and its fuel economy is not worth the sacrifice in acceleration. Luckily there is the optional 4.6-liter, 320-horsepower Northstar V-8 engine mated to a six-speed automatic transmission. It provides a lot more power—it can launch the crossover to 60 mph in about 6.5 seconds—but fuel economy is still an issue. Car and Driver characterizes both the V-6 and V-8 as "engines to be proud of," though they called out the V-8-powered 2009 Cadillac SRX as “a sports car among SUVs." Autoblog believes that Cadillac and SRX enthusiasts will enjoy the "smooth operation and responsiveness" of both 2009 Cadillac SRX engines. They declare the 2009 Cadillac offering of a "3.6L [as] very good—quiet but stout enough to move the SRX briskly." Edmunds reports, “The combination of the Northstar V-8 and six-speed automatic transmission provides strong acceleration,” but adds that the V-6 is “adequate for most drivers.”

The SRX is available in either rear- or all-wheel drive, and with either powertrain, fuel economy is unimpressive—as low as 13 mpg city with the V-8. Unlike many other SUVs, the 2009 Cadillac SRX V-6 option impresses ConsumerGuide by using "regular-grade gas," while recommending "premium for the V-8."

The 2009 Cadillac SRX handles nimbly, with either its standard suspension or GM's optional Magnetic Ride Control, which uses magnetic force to control the stiffness of the shocks. Autoblog attests "in terms of overall ride and handling, [the Cadillac SRX] is nothing short of excellent." Kelley Blue Book declares the "2009 Cadillac SRX glides serenely without veer or vagueness." While the "steering feel is light at first," they say, the suspension "quickly firms up as the speed rises." A hallmark of the crossover SRX, Cadillac designs a reasonable turn radius that makes it "relatively easy to park and maneuver in tight spots." MyRide.com, though, notes the SRX "tends to understeer heavily when entering a turn too hot, and the body leans more than a typical passenger car." Car and Driver contends the SRX “feels like a sports car among SUVs with predictable steering, athletic handling, and well-weighted throttle and brakes.”

Other reviewers rate the Magnetic Ride Control as a must-have. ConsumerGuide says the Magnetic Ride Control system is nearly essential: "without it, SRX suffers from lots of bounding and other unwanted body motions, even on mildly rippled pavement."

Conclusion

Crisp sport-sedan handling sets the SRX apart, but its fuel economy won’t win friends.

PERFORMANCE | 7 out of 10Expert Quotes:V-6 engine is merely adequateCar and DriverSRX feels lighter and more nimble than you'd expectAutoblogviable alternative to a full-size SUVKelley Blue BookAs sporting to drive as some performance-minded sedansMyRide.com The 2009 Cadillac SRX handles surprisingly well for an SUV, and with the Magnetic Ride Control option, you’ll quickly forget that you are piloting a taller vehicle. The 2009 SRX comes with a 3.6-liter, 260-horsepower V-6 as the standard engine teamed with a five-speed automatic. This is the price leader, but it won’t satisfy your needs if you are looking for performance, and its fuel economy is not worth the sacrifice in acceleration. Luckily there is the optional 4.6-liter, 320-horsepower Northstar V-8 engine mated to a six-speed automatic transmission. It provides a lot more power—it can launch the crossover to 60 mph in about 6.5 seconds—but fuel economy is still an issue. Car and Driver characterizes both the V-6 and V-8 as "engines to be proud of," though they called out the V-8-powered 2009 Cadillac SRX as “a sports car among SUVs." Autoblog believes that Cadillac and SRX enthusiasts will enjoy the "smooth operation and responsiveness" of both 2009 Cadillac SRX engines. They declare the 2009 Cadillac offering of a "3.6L [as] very good—quiet but stout enough to move the SRX briskly." Edmunds reports, “The combination of the Northstar V-8 and six-speed automatic transmission provides strong acceleration,” but adds that the V-6 is “adequate for most drivers.” The SRX is available in either rear- or all-wheel drive, and with either powertrain, fuel economy is unimpressive—as low as 13 mpg city with the V-8. Unlike many other SUVs, the 2009 Cadillac SRX V-6 option impresses ConsumerGuide by using "regular-grade gas," while recommending "premium for the V-8." The 2009 Cadillac SRX handles nimbly, with either its standard suspension or GM's optional Magnetic Ride Control, which uses magnetic force to control the stiffness of the shocks. Autoblog attests "in terms of overall ride and handling, [the Cadillac SRX] is nothing short of excellent." Kelley Blue Book declares the "2009 Cadillac SRX glides serenely without veer or vagueness." While the "steering feel is light at first," they say, the suspension "quickly firms up as the speed rises." A hallmark of the crossover SRX, Cadillac designs a reasonable turn radius that makes it "relatively easy to park and maneuver in tight spots." MyRide.com, though, notes the SRX "tends to understeer heavily when entering a turn too hot, and the body leans more than a typical passenger car." Car and Driver contends the SRX “feels like a sports car among SUVs with predictable steering, athletic handling, and well-weighted throttle and brakes.” Other reviewers rate the Magnetic Ride Control as a must-have. ConsumerGuide says the Magnetic Ride Control system is nearly essential: "without it, SRX suffers from lots of bounding and other unwanted body motions, even on mildly rippled pavement." ConclusionCrisp sport-sedan handling sets the SRX apart, but its fuel economy won’t win friends.  2009 CADILLAC SRX STYLING | [8 out of 10] Autoblog: "the dashboard is particularly pleasing to the eye" Kelley Blue Book: "a sharp-looking vehicle" Edmunds: "styling suggests sporting intent" Car and Driver: "wagon-like boxiness that may polarize audiences" The SRX was introduced ...

Read More of this Review:

  1. styling
  2. performance
  3. quality
  4. safety
  5. features

Other Choices:

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport outshines the Cadillac off-road, but with a cramped and compromised interior, it isn’t as functional as the more squared-off SRX. The Volkswagen Touareg is a five-seater as well, but its approach to design is more fluid and “European.” The Infiniti FX seats five and features even more controversial styling than the SRX—though to many, it’s arguably the best-looking, even after a mild redesign for ‘09. The Lexus RX 350 is a traditional luxury crossover with an enviable reputation for quality and a hybrid option, but driving excitement is not at all the name of its game. The Mercedes-Benz M-Class doesn't offer a third-row seat, and feels the least nimble of the bunch on a twisty road, but it’s spacious and available with a clean-diesel option that gets class-leading fuel economy.

Next Steps:

Get a free price quote

for the 2009 Cadillac SRX from a dealer near you

Check Insurance Rates

for the 2009 Cadillac SRX

Check Financing Rates

for the 2009 Cadillac SRX

Check Local Classifieds

for a 2009 Cadillac SRX near you

See the Cadillac SRX in Other Years:

2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004

Comments (0 total)

Be the first to post a comment

Post a comment

Post anonymously, or
(Required)
(Required - will not be published, sold or shared)
(Optional - your 'posted by' name will link to the URL)

Remember Me?

I have read TheCarConnection.com's privacy policy