Of them all, the C63 AMG has a driving feel that’s closest to that of the CTS-V—stout, though surprisingly crisp and responsive on the track—but with less power, the C63 isn’t quite as fast.
The BMW M5 can accelerate about as quickly as the CTS-V, but it’s about $25,000 more than the CTS-V and includes a complex set of electronic controls (M Drive) that can be overwhelming.
Another rival remains the Audi S6, which comes with a 435-horsepower, 5.2-liter V-10 engine and all-wheel drive; it’s a smooth, confident sport sedan with a lot of personality and a beautiful interior, but it’s just not as fast.
Jaguar’s XFR is another rival to the CTS-V, with a warm, classy interior and amazing straight-line acceleration, but it’s not as precise a handler or curve-carver.
Finally, the limited-production Lexus IS-F is a possibility, with a 416-horsepower V-8 and some serious track credentials.
Among all of these possibilities, only the CTS-V and M5 are offered with a manual gearbox.
Get FREE Dealer Quotes
|2010 Cadillac CTS-VBrowse Used Listings||2010 Audi S6Browse Used Listings||2010 BMW M5Browse Used Listings||2010 Lexus IS FBrowse Used Listings||2010 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMGBrowse Used Listings|
|14 MPG City / 19 MPG Hwy||14 MPG City / 19 MPG Hwy||11 MPG City / 17 MPG Hwy||16 MPG City / 23 MPG Hwy||12 MPG City / 19 MPG Hwy|
|Gas V8||Gas V10||Gas V10||Gas V8||Gas V8|
|4-Door Sedan||4-Door Sedan Prestige||4-Door Sedan||F 4-Door Sedan||4-Door Sedan C 63 AMG RWD|
|Rear Wheel Drive||All-Wheel Drive||Rear Wheel Drive||Rear Wheel Drive||Rear Wheel Drive|
|4 Door Sedan||4 Door Sedan||4 Door Sedan||4 Door Sedan||4 Door Sedan|
|Manual||Automatic||Automatic w/manual shift||Automatic||Automatic|
|Detailed Spec Comparison|
|2010 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2010 Audi S6||2010 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2010 BMW M5||2010 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2010 Lexus IS F||2010 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG|