Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Add a Vehicle to Compare




Change a Vehicle to Compare




Compare 2013 Nissan Rogue vs 2013 Chevrolet Equinox

2013 Nissan Rogue Change
2013 Chevrolet Equinox Change
+ Add a Car
Selected Style FWD 4-Door S
Switch Style

Drivetrain

Trim

Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
FWD 4-Door S 23 28 $19,363 $20,310
FWD 4-Door SV 23 28 $21,209 $22,750
FWD 4-Door SL 23 28 $24,836 $26,650
AWD 4-Door S 22 27 $20,600 $21,610
AWD 4-Door SV 22 27 $22,418 $24,050
AWD 4-Door SL 22 27 $26,045 $27,950
FWD 4-Door LS
Switch Style

Drivetrain

Trim

Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
FWD 4-Door LS 22 32 $23,013 $24,225
FWD 4-Door LT 22 32 $24,576 $25,870
FWD 4-Door LTZ 22 32 $29,435 $30,985
AWD 4-Door LS 20 29 $24,676 $25,975
AWD 4-Door LT 20 29 $26,239 $27,620
AWD 4-Door LTZ 20 29 $31,098 $32,735
Pricing
Invoice Price
$19,363
$23,013
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price
$20,310
$24,225
Monthly Payment Estimate
$339 / month
$404 / month
Dealer Price Quotes
The Car Connection's Take
TCC Rating
7.2
/ 10
TCC Rating
How does the
TCC Rating work?
The TCC Rating is a clear numeric rating value based on a 10-point scale that reflects the overall opinion of our automotive experts on any vehicle and rolls up ratings we give each vehicle across sub-categories you care about like performance, safety, styling and more.

Our rating also has simple color-coded “Stop” (red), “Caution” (orange),
or “Go” (green) messages along with the numerical score so you can easily understand where we stand at a glance.

Our automotive experts then also collect and show you what other websites say about these different aspects of any vehicle. We do this leg work for you to simplify your research process.

Learn more about how we rate and review cars here.

?
Read Our Full Review
8.0
/ 10
TCC Rating
?
Read Our Full Review
TCC's Bottom Line The 2013 Nissan Rogue may not have excitement in its corner, but its layout, features, and affordability make a lot of sense for smaller families. The 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is a good, affordable choice for cost-conscious families, but it doesn't skimp on comfort, safety, or the latest connectivity features.
TCC Likes
TCC Dislikes
Fuel Economy
Fuel Economy - City 23 mpg 22 mpg
Fuel Economy - Highway 28 mpg 32 mpg
Vehicle
EPA Classification FWD Sport Utility 2WD Sport Utility Vehicle
Interior Dimensions
Passenger Capacity 5 5
Second Shoulder Room (in) 53.600 55.30
Front Leg Room (in) 42.500 41.20
Front Hip Room (in) 53.100 54.60
Second Leg Room (in) 35.300 39.90
Front Head Room (in) 40.400 40.90
Passenger Volume (ft³) 126.400 99.7
Second Hip Room (in) 51.200 51.10
Front Shoulder Room (in) 55.900 55.80
Second Head Room (in) 38.300 39.20
Exterior Dimensions
Rear Door Opening Width (in) - TBD - - TBD -
Height, Overall (in) 65.300 66.30
Liftover Height (in) 30.000 28.80
Track Width, Rear (in) 61.000 62.10
Wheelbase (in) 105.900 112.50
Rear Door Opening Height (in) - TBD - 28.80
Width, Max w/o mirrors (in) 70.900 72.50
Track Width, Front (in) 60.600 62.90
Min Ground Clearance (in) 8.300 6.90
Length, Overall (in) 183.300 187.80
Cargo Area Dimensions
Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³) NA NA
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings (in) - TBD - - TBD -
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in) 37.800 - TBD -
Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³) 28.900 31.5
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in) 55.200 - TBD -
Cargo Box (Area) Height (in) 31.100 - TBD -
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in) - TBD - - TBD -
Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³) 57.900 63.7
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3 (in) NA NA
Brakes
Disc - Rear (Yes or ) Yes Yes
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in) 11.700 x 0.600 11.9 x 0.78
Brake Type Pwr Pwr
Rear Drum Diam x Width (in) NA NA
Disc - Front (Yes or ) Yes Yes
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in) 11.800 x 1.000 12.6 x 1.18
Drum - Rear (Yes or ) NA NA
Brake ABS System 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Fuel Tank
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal) 15.900 18.8
Steering
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft) 37.400 40.0
Steering Type Pwr Rack & Pinion Pwr
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering) 3.100 3.46
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall (ft) 39.000 - TBD -
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall 17.100 18.1
Tires
Spare Tire Size T155/90D16 Compact
Front Tire Order Code NA QYZ
Spare Tire Order Code NA N/A
Rear Tire Size P215/70R16 P225/65R17
Rear Tire Order Code NA QYZ
Front Tire Size P215/70R16 P225/65R17
Trailering
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs) 1000 1500
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs) 1000 1500
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs) 100 150
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs) 150 225
Weight Information
Base Curb Weight (lbs) 3276 3777
Wheels
Rear Wheel Material Steel Aluminum
Rear Wheel Size (in) 16 x 6.5 17 x - TBD -
Front Wheel Material Steel Aluminum
Spare Wheel Material Steel Steel
Front Wheel Size (in) 16 x 6.5 17 x - TBD -
Spare Wheel Size (in) Compact Compact
Cooling System
Total Cooling System Capacity (qts) 7.700 8.9
Electrical
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary) - TBD - 525
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps) 110 120
Engine
Engine Type Gas I4 Gas/Ethanol I4
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
SAE Net Torque @ RPM 175 @ 4400 172 @ 4900
Engine Order Code NA LEA
Displacement 2.5L/152 2.4/145
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM 170 @ 6000 182 @ 6700
Mileage
Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG) 25 26
EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG) 28 32
EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG) 23 22
Transmission
Reverse Ratio (:1) 1.750 2.88
Second Gear Ratio (:1) NA 2.87
Trans Order Code NA MX0
Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1) 5.790 3.23
Fourth Gear Ratio (:1) NA 1.41
Trans Description Cont. Continuously variable ratio Automatic
Transfer Case Gear Ratio (:1), Low NA NA
Sixth Gear Ratio (:1) NA 0.74
First Gear Ratio (:1) 2.340-0.390 4.48
Clutch Size (in) NA NA
Third Gear Ratio (:1) NA 1.84
Trans Type 1 6
Drivetrain Front Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive
Transfer Case Gear Ratio (:1), High NA NA
Fifth Gear Ratio (:1) NA 1.00
Trans Description Cont. Again NA NA
Summary
Body Style Sport Utility Sport Utility Vehicle
Vehicle Name Nissan Rogue Chevrolet Equinox
Suspension
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.) NA NA
Shock Absorber Diameter - Rear (mm) - TBD - N/A
Suspension Type - Front MacPherson Strut MacPherson strut
Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Rear (in) 0.750 - TBD -
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.) w/Coil Springs NA
Shock Absorber Diameter - Front (mm) - TBD - N/A
Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Front (in) 0.910 NA
Suspension Type - Rear Multi-Link Multi link
Emissions
Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year 7.4 7.1
EPA Greenhouse Gas Score 6 6 (2012)
Crash Test Ratings
Overall Rating
Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger
Overall Side Crash Rating
Side Barrier Rating
Side Barrier Rating Driver
Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat
Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat
Combined Side Rating Front Seat
Combined Side Rating Rear Seat
Rollover Rating
 
© 2014 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.