Find a Car
Go!

Add a Vehicle to Compare

Change a Vehicle to Compare

Compare 2013 Mazda CX-5 vs 2013 Chevrolet Equinox

2013 Mazda CX-5 Change
2013 Chevrolet Equinox Change
+ Add a Car
Selected Style FWD 4-Door Manual Sport
Switch Style

Transmission

Drivetrain

Trim

Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
FWD 4-Door Manual Sport 26 35 $20,396 $20,995
FWD 4-Door Automatic Sport 26 32 $21,754 $22,395
AWD 4-Door Automatic Sport 25 31 $22,967 $23,645
FWD 4-Door Automatic Touring 26 32 $23,501 $24,195
AWD 4-Door Automatic Touring 25 31 $24,714 $25,445
FWD 4-Door Automatic Grand Touring 26 32 $26,557 $27,345
AWD 4-Door Automatic Grand Touring 25 31 $27,771 $28,595
FWD 4-Door LS
Switch Style

Drivetrain

Trim

Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
FWD 4-Door LS 22 32 $23,013 $24,225
FWD 4-Door LT 22 32 $24,576 $25,870
AWD 4-Door LS 20 29 $24,676 $25,975
AWD 4-Door LT 20 29 $26,239 $27,620
FWD 4-Door LTZ 22 32 $29,435 $30,985
AWD 4-Door LTZ 20 29 $31,098 $32,735
Pricing
Invoice Price
$20,396
$23,013
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price
$20,995
$24,225
Monthly Payment Estimate
$350 / month
$404 / month
Dealer Price Quotes
The Car Connection's Take
TCC Rating
7.4
/ 10
TCC Rating
How does the
TCC Rating work?
The TCC Rating is a clear numeric rating value based on a 10-point scale that reflects the overall opinion of our automotive experts on any vehicle and rolls up ratings we give each vehicle across sub-categories you care about like performance, safety, styling and more.

Our rating also has simple color-coded “Stop” (red), “Caution” (orange),
or “Go” (green) messages along with the numerical score so you can easily understand where we stand at a glance.

Our automotive experts then also collect and show you what other websites say about these different aspects of any vehicle. We do this leg work for you to simplify your research process.

Learn more about how we rate and review cars here.

?
Read Our Full Review
8.0
/ 10
TCC Rating
?
Read Our Full Review
TCC's Bottom Line The 2013 Mazda CX-5 is an attractive and modern crossover with great handling and surprising space, but sluggish acceleration. The 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is a good, affordable choice for cost-conscious families, but it doesn't skimp on comfort, safety, or the latest connectivity features.
TCC Likes
TCC Dislikes
Fuel Economy
Fuel Economy - City 26 mpg 22 mpg
Fuel Economy - Highway 35 mpg 32 mpg
Vehicle
EPA Classification 4WD Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD Sport Utility Vehicle
Interior Dimensions
Second Shoulder Room (in) 55.500 55.30
Front Leg Room (in) 41.000 41.20
Passenger Volume (ft³) 103.800 99.7
Front Hip Room (in) 55.200 54.60
Second Leg Room (in) 39.300 39.90
Front Head Room (in) 40.100 40.90
Passenger Capacity 5 5
Second Hip Room (in) 53.700 51.10
Front Shoulder Room (in) 57.500 55.80
Second Head Room (in) 39.000 39.20
Exterior Dimensions
Rear Door Opening Width (in) 44.400 - TBD -
Height, Overall (in) 67.300 66.30
Liftover Height (in) 29.200 28.80
Track Width, Rear (in) 62.500 62.10
Wheelbase (in) 106.300 112.50
Rear Door Opening Height (in) 32.600 28.80
Width, Max w/o mirrors (in) 72.400 72.50
Track Width, Front (in) 62.400 62.90
Min Ground Clearance (in) 8.500 6.90
Length, Overall (in) 179.300 187.80
Cargo Area Dimensions
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings (in) 41.300 - TBD -
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in) 38.700 - TBD -
Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³) 34.100 31.5
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in) 57.100 - TBD -
Cargo Box (Area) Height (in) 34.600 - TBD -
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in) - TBD - - TBD -
Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³) 65.400 63.7
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3 (in) NA NA
Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³) NA NA
Brakes
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in) 11.900 x 0.400 11.9 x 0.78
Brake Type Pwr Pwr
Rear Drum Diam x Width (in) NA NA
Disc - Front (Yes or ) Yes Yes
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in) 11.700 x 1.100 12.6 x 1.18
Drum - Rear (Yes or ) NA NA
Brake ABS System 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Disc - Rear (Yes or ) Yes Yes
Fuel Tank
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal) 14.8 18.8
Steering
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft) 36.700 40.0
Steering Type Electric Rack & Pinion Pwr
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering) 2.700 3.46
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall (ft) 38.400 - TBD -
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall 15.500 18.1
Tires
Spare Tire Size T145/90D16 Compact
Front Tire Order Code NA QYZ
Spare Tire Order Code NA N/A
Rear Tire Size P225/65R17 P225/65R17
Rear Tire Order Code NA QYZ
Front Tire Size P225/65R17 P225/65R17
Trailering
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs) 2000 1500
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs) 2000 1500
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs) 200 150
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs) 300 225
Weight Information
Base Curb Weight (lbs) 3208 3777
Wheels
Rear Wheel Material Aluminum Aluminum
Rear Wheel Size (in) 17 x 7.0 17 x - TBD -
Front Wheel Material Aluminum Aluminum
Spare Wheel Material - TBD - Steel
Front Wheel Size (in) 17 x 7.0 17 x - TBD -
Spare Wheel Size (in) 16 x - TBD - Compact
Cooling System
Total Cooling System Capacity (qts) 7.8 8.9
Electrical
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps) 100 120
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary) - TBD - 525
Engine
Engine Type Gas I4 Gas/Ethanol I4
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
SAE Net Torque @ RPM 150 @ 4000 172 @ 4900
Engine Order Code NA LEA
Displacement 2.0L/122 2.4/145
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM 155 @ 6000 182 @ 6700
Mileage
Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG) 29 26
EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG) 35 32
EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG) 26 22
Transmission
Reverse Ratio (:1) 3.724 2.88
Second Gear Ratio (:1) 1.947 2.87
Trans Order Code NA MX0
Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1) 4.705 3.23
Fourth Gear Ratio (:1) 1.029 1.41
Trans Description Cont. Manual Automatic
Drivetrain Front Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive
Transfer Case Gear Ratio (:1), Low NA NA
Sixth Gear Ratio (:1) 0.680 0.74
First Gear Ratio (:1) 3.700 4.48
Clutch Size (in) NA NA
Third Gear Ratio (:1) 1.300 1.84
Trans Type 6 6
Transfer Case Gear Ratio (:1), High NA NA
Fifth Gear Ratio (:1) 0.837 1.00
Trans Description Cont. Again NA NA
Summary
Vehicle Name Mazda CX-5 Chevrolet Equinox
Body Style Sport Utility Vehicle Sport Utility Vehicle
Suspension
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.) NA NA
Shock Absorber Diameter - Rear (mm) - TBD - N/A
Suspension Type - Front MacPherson Strut MacPherson strut
Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Rear (in) - TBD - - TBD -
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.) NA NA
Shock Absorber Diameter - Front (mm) - TBD - N/A
Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Front (in) - TBD - NA
Suspension Type - Rear Multi-Link Multi link
Emissions
Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year 6.3 7.1
EPA Greenhouse Gas Score - 6 (2012)
Crash Test Ratings
Overall Rating
Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger
Overall Side Crash Rating
Side Barrier Rating
Side Barrier Rating Driver
Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat
Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat
Combined Side Rating Front Seat
Combined Side Rating Rear Seat
Rollover Rating
 
© 2016 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by Internet Brands Automotive Group. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Read Our Cookie Policy.