Find a Car
Go!

Add a Vehicle to Compare

Change a Vehicle to Compare

Compare 2013 Ford Taurus vs 2013 Lincoln MKZ

2013 Ford Taurus Change
2013 Lincoln MKZ Change
+ Add a Car
Selected Style 4-Door Sedan SE FWD
Switch Style

Body Style

Drivetrain

Trim

Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
4-Door Sedan FWD SE 19 29 $24,631 $26,700
4-Door Sedan FWD SEL 19 29 $26,660 $28,900
4-Door Sedan AWD SEL 18 26 $28,368 $30,750
4-Door Sedan FWD Limited 19 29 $30,535 $33,100
4-Door Sedan AWD Limited 18 26 $32,243 $34,950
4-Door Sedan AWD SHO 17 25 $36,254 $39,300
4-Door Sedan Hybrid FWD
Switch Style

Body Style

Engine

Drivetrain

Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
4-Door Sedan FWD 22 33 $34,129 $35,925
4-Door Sedan FWD Hybrid 38 37 $34,129 $35,925
4-Door Sedan AWD 22 31 $35,924 $37,815
Pricing
Invoice Price
$24,631
$34,129
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price
$26,700
$35,925
Monthly Payment Estimate
$445 / month
$599 / month
Dealer Price Quotes
The Car Connection's Take
TCC Rating
8.0
/ 10
TCC Rating
How does the
TCC Rating work?
The TCC Rating is a clear numeric rating value based on a 10-point scale that reflects the overall opinion of our automotive experts on any vehicle and rolls up ratings we give each vehicle across sub-categories you care about like performance, safety, styling and more.

Our rating also has simple color-coded “Stop” (red), “Caution” (orange),
or “Go” (green) messages along with the numerical score so you can easily understand where we stand at a glance.

Our automotive experts then also collect and show you what other websites say about these different aspects of any vehicle. We do this leg work for you to simplify your research process.

Learn more about how we rate and review cars here.

?
Read Our Full Review
8.4
/ 10
TCC Rating
?
Read Our Full Review
TCC's Bottom Line The 2013 Ford Taurus gets improved performance and is more of a technology and luxury flagship than ever--although its 'smaller inside' packaging continues to limit its appeal. The 2013 Lincoln MKZ strikes out in a more confident direction, and places a big bet on best-in-class fuel economy and technology.
TCC Likes
TCC Dislikes
Fuel Economy
Fuel Economy - City 19 mpg 38 mpg
Fuel Economy - Highway 29 mpg 37 mpg
Vehicle
EPA Classification Large Cars Midsize Cars
Interior Dimensions
Passenger Capacity 5 5
Front Hip Room (in) 56.300 55.100
Second Leg Room (in) 38.100 37.000
Front Head Room (in) 39.000 37.900
Second Hip Room (in) 55.800 53.800
Front Shoulder Room (in) 57.900 57.700
Passenger Volume (ft³) 102.200 96.500
Second Head Room (in) 37.800 36.600
Second Shoulder Room (in) 56.900 55.300
Front Leg Room (in) 41.900 44.300
Exterior Dimensions
Track Width, Rear (in) 65.500 62.000
Wheelbase (in) 112.900 112.100
Liftover Height (in) 30.400 - TBD -
Width, Max w/o mirrors (in) 76.200 73.400
Track Width, Front (in) 65.300 62.300
Min Ground Clearance (in) - TBD - - TBD -
Length, Overall (in) 202.900 194.100
Height, Overall (in) 60.700 58.200
Cargo Area Dimensions
Trunk Volume (ft³) 20.100 11.600
Brakes
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in) 13.860 x - TBD - - TBD -
Brake Type Pwr Pwr
Rear Drum Diam x Width (in) NA NA
Disc - Front (Yes or ) Yes Yes
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in) 13.860 x - TBD - - TBD -
Drum - Rear (Yes or ) NA NA
Brake ABS System 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Disc - Rear (Yes or ) Yes Yes
Fuel Tank
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal) 19.000 13.5
Steering
Steering Type Pwr Rack & Pinion Pwr Rack & Pinion
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering) - TBD - 2.700
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall (ft) - TBD - N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall 15.000 14.800
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft) 39.500 38.000
Tires
Spare Tire Order Code NA N/A
Rear Tire Size P235/60R17 P245/45VR18
Rear Tire Order Code TCK N/A
Front Tire Size P235/60R17 P245/45VR18
Spare Tire Size Compact NA
Front Tire Order Code TCK N/A
Trailering
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs) 1000 N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs) 1000 N/A
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs) 100 N/A
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs) 150 N/A
Weight Information
Base Curb Weight (lbs) 4037 3828
Wheels
Rear Wheel Size (in) 17 x - TBD - 18 x - TBD -
Front Wheel Material Aluminum Aluminum
Spare Wheel Material Steel NA
Front Wheel Size (in) 17 x - TBD - 18 x - TBD -
Spare Wheel Size (in) Compact NA
Rear Wheel Material Aluminum Aluminum
Cooling System
Total Cooling System Capacity (qts) - TBD - - TBD -
Electrical
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps) - TBD - - TBD -
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary) - TBD - - TBD -
Engine
Engine Type Gas V6 Gas/Electric I4
Fuel System Electronic Fuel Injection Direct Injection
SAE Net Torque @ RPM 254 @ 4000 129 @ 4000
Engine Order Code 998 99U
Displacement 3.5L/213 2.0L/122
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM 288 @ 6500 188 @ 6000
Mileage
Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG) 23 38
EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG) 29 37
EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG) 19 38
Transmission
Reverse Ratio (:1) 2.882 - TBD -
Second Gear Ratio (:1) 2.872 NA
Trans Order Code 44J - TBD -
Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1) 2.770 2.570
Fourth Gear Ratio (:1) 1.414 NA
Trans Description Cont. Automatic w/Manual Shift Continuously Variable Ratio
Sixth Gear Ratio (:1) 0.742 NA
First Gear Ratio (:1) 4.484 - TBD -
Clutch Size (in) NA NA
Third Gear Ratio (:1) 1.842 NA
Trans Type 6 1
Drivetrain Front Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive
Fifth Gear Ratio (:1) 1.000 NA
Trans Description Cont. Again NA NA
Summary
Body Style Sedan Sedan
Vehicle Name Ford Taurus Lincoln MKZ
Suspension
Shock Absorber Diameter - Rear (mm) - TBD - N/A
Suspension Type - Front MacPherson Strut MacPherson Strut
Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Rear (in) 0.827 - TBD -
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.) w/Coil Springs NA
Shock Absorber Diameter - Front (mm) - TBD - N/A
Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Front (in) 1.102 - TBD -
Suspension Type - Rear Multi-link Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.) w/Coil Springs NA
Emissions
Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year 8.0 4.1
EPA Greenhouse Gas Score - TBD - -
Crash Test Ratings
Overall Rating
Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger
Overall Side Crash Rating
Side Barrier Rating
Side Barrier Rating Driver
Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat
Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat
Combined Side Rating Front Seat
Combined Side Rating Rear Seat
Rollover Rating
 
© 2016 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by Internet Brands Automotive Group. Stock photography by izmostock. Read our Cookie Policy.