Compare 2012 Ford Edge vs 2012 Mazda CX-9

2012 Ford Edge
2012 Mazda CX-9
Add Vehicle
Select style
4-Door FWD SE
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
4-Door FWD SE 19 27 $26,323 $27,770
4-Door FWD SEL 19 27 $29,057 $31,080
4-Door AWD SEL 18 25 $30,741 $32,930
4-Door FWD Limited 19 27 $32,566 $34,935
4-Door AWD Limited 18 25 $34,250 $36,785
4-Door FWD Sport 19 26 $34,545 $37,110
4-Door AWD Sport 17 23 $36,229 $38,960
Select style
FWD 4-Door Sport
Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
FWD 4-Door Sport 17 24 $28,125 $29,725
AWD 4-Door Sport 16 22 $29,439 $31,115
FWD 4-Door Touring 17 24 $29,941 $31,645
AWD 4-Door Touring 16 22 $31,254 $33,035
FWD 4-Door Grand Touring 17 24 $31,917 $33,735
AWD 4-Door Grand Touring 16 22 $33,230 $35,125
Pricing
Invoice Price
$26,323
$28,125
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price
$27,770
$29,725
Monthly Payment Estimate
$463 / month
$495 / month
The Car Connection's Take
TCC Rating
8.2
8.0
TCC’s Bottom Line
The 2012 Ford Edge rises to the top of the five-seat crossover niche with forward-thinking technology and a gas-saving EcoBoost option. The 2012 Mazda CX-9 is a little more enjoyable to drive than most crossovers its size, while it manages three rows of seating, a plush cabin, and decent comfort.
TCC Likes
TCC Dislikes
Fuel Economy
City
19 mpg 17 mpg
Highway
27 mpg 24 mpg
Vehicle
EPA Classification
FWD Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD Sport Utility Vehicle
Interior Dimensions
Second Head Room (in)
39.3 39.0
Second Shoulder Room (in)
58.7 58.7
Front Leg Room (in)
40.7 40.9
Passenger Capacity
5 7
Front Hip Room (in)
54.8 56.5
Second Leg Room (in)
39.6 39.8
Front Head Room (in)
40.0 39.6
Second Hip Room (in)
56.1 56.0
Front Shoulder Room (in)
58.9 59.4
Passenger Volume (ft³)
108.4 139.4
Third Leg Room (in)
- 32.4
Third Hip Room (in)
- 43.7
Third Head Room (in)
- 35.4
Third Shoulder Room (in)
- 56.9
Exterior Dimensions
Min Ground Clearance (in)
7.9 8.0
Length, Overall (in)
184.2 200.2
Rear Door Opening Width (in)
- TBD - 47.3
Height, Overall (in)
67.0 68.0
Liftover Height (in)
- TBD - 31.3
Track Width, Rear (in)
65.2 64.7
Wheelbase (in)
111.2 113.2
Rear Door Opening Height (in)
- TBD - 31.7
Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)
76.0 76.2
Track Width, Front (in)
65.4 65.1
Cargo Area Dimensions
Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)
NA 17.2
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings (in)
- TBD - 46.1
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in)
- TBD - 48.9
Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)
32.2 48.3
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in)
- TBD - 58.5
Cargo Box (Area) Height (in)
- TBD - 34.8
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in)
- TBD - - TBD -
Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)
68.9 100.7
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3 (in)
- TBD - 19.0
Brakes
Disc - Rear (Yes or )
Yes Yes
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
- TBD - 12.8 x - TBD -
Brake Type
Pwr Pwr
Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)
NA NA
Disc - Front (Yes or )
Yes Yes
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
- TBD - 12.6 x - TBD -
Drum - Rear (Yes or )
NA NA
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel 4-wheel
Fuel Tank
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)
18.0 20.1
Steering
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)
39.3 37.4
Steering Type
Pwr Rack & Pinion Pwr Rack & Pinion
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)
3.1 3.1
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall (ft)
- TBD - N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall
17.7 16.3
Tires
Front Tire Size
P235/65R17 P245/60R18
Spare Tire Size
Compact T155/90R18
Front Tire Order Code
NA N/A
Spare Tire Order Code
NA N/A
Rear Tire Size
P235/65R17 P245/60R18
Rear Tire Order Code
NA N/A
Trailering
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)
200 200
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)
200 300
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)
2000 2000
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)
2000 2000
Weight Information
Base Curb Weight (lbs)
4056 4328
Wheels
Spare Wheel Size (in)
Compact Compact
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum Aluminum
Rear Wheel Size (in)
17 x - TBD - 18 x 7.5
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum Aluminum
Spare Wheel Material
Steel - TBD -
Front Wheel Size (in)
17 x - TBD - 18 x 7.5
Cooling System
Total Cooling System Capacity (qts)
- TBD - 13.7
Electrical
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
- TBD - - TBD -
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
150 110
Engine
Displacement
3.5L/213 3.7L/227
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
285 @ 6500 273 @ 6250
Engine Type
Gas V6 Gas V6
Fuel System
Electronic Fuel Injection Electronic Fuel Injectino
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
253 @ 4000 270 @ 4250
Engine Order Code
99C NA
Mileage
EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)
19 17
Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)
22 19
EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)
27 24
Transmission
Trans Type
6 6
Drivetrain
Front Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive
Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.00 0.85
Trans Description Cont. Again
NA NA
Reverse Ratio (:1)
2.88 3.39
Second Gear Ratio (:1)
2.87 2.37
Trans Order Code
44J NA
Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1)
3.16 3.46
Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.41 1.15
Trans Description Cont.
Automatic Automatic
Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)
0.74 0.68
First Gear Ratio (:1)
4.48 4.14
Clutch Size (in)
NA NA
Third Gear Ratio (:1)
1.84 1.55
Transfer Case Gear Ratio (:1), High
- NA
Transfer Case Gear Ratio (:1), Low
- NA
Summary
Body Style
Sport Utility 4 Door Sport Utility Vehicle
Vehicle Name
Ford Edge Mazda CX-9
Suspension
Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Front (in)
1.3 - TBD -
Suspension Type - Rear
Multi-link Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)
NA NA
Shock Absorber Diameter - Rear (mm)
- TBD - - TBD -
Suspension Type - Front
MacPherson strut Independent
Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Rear (in)
0.9 - TBD -
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)
NA NA
Shock Absorber Diameter - Front (mm)
- TBD - - TBD -
Emissions
EPA Greenhouse Gas Score
4 (2011) 3
Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year
8.5 9.6
Crash Test Ratings
Overall Rating
--
Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating
--
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver
--
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger
--
Overall Side Crash Rating
--
Side Barrier Rating
--
Side Barrier Rating Driver
--
Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat
--
Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat
--
Combined Side Rating Front Seat
--
Combined Side Rating Rear Seat
--
Rollover Rating

Get FREE Dealer Quotes

From dealers near you
Go!

Add a Vehicle to Compare

Select a vehicle below
Continue