Advertisement
Find a Car
Go!

Add a Vehicle to Compare




Change a Vehicle to Compare




Compare 2013 Ford C-Max vs 2013 Mazda CX-5

2013 Ford C-Max Change
2013 Mazda CX-5 Change
+ Add a Car
Selected Style 2013 Ford C-Max
Switch Style

Body Style

Engine

Trim

Other

Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
Hybrid 5-Door HB SE 42 37 $23,499 $25,200
Hybrid 5-Door HB SEL 42 37 $26,451 $28,365
Energi 5-Door HB SEL N/A N/A $30,726 $32,950
FWD 4-Door Manual Sport
Switch Style

Transmission

Drivetrain

Trim

Style MPG City MPG Hwy Invoice MSRP
FWD 4-Door Manual Sport 26 35 $20,396 $20,995
FWD 4-Door Automatic Sport 26 32 $21,754 $22,395
FWD 4-Door Automatic Touring 26 32 $23,501 $24,195
FWD 4-Door Automatic Grand Touring 26 32 $26,557 $27,345
AWD 4-Door Automatic Sport 25 31 $22,967 $23,645
AWD 4-Door Automatic Touring 25 31 $24,714 $25,445
AWD 4-Door Automatic Grand Touring 25 31 $27,771 $28,595
Pricing
Invoice Price
N/A
$20,396
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price
N/A
$20,995
Monthly Payment Estimate
$0 / month
$350 / month
Dealer Price Quotes
The Car Connection's Take
TCC Rating
7.8
/ 10
TCC Rating
How does the
TCC Rating work?
The TCC Rating is a clear numeric rating value based on a 10-point scale that reflects the overall opinion of our automotive experts on any vehicle and rolls up ratings we give each vehicle across sub-categories you care about like performance, safety, styling and more.

Our rating also has simple color-coded “Stop” (red), “Caution” (orange),
or “Go” (green) messages along with the numerical score so you can easily understand where we stand at a glance.

Our automotive experts then also collect and show you what other websites say about these different aspects of any vehicle. We do this leg work for you to simplify your research process.

Learn more about how we rate and review cars here.

?
Read Our Full Review
7.4
/ 10
TCC Rating
?
Read Our Full Review
TCC's Bottom Line The 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid is the first head-to-head challenger for the Toyota Prius since that car grabbed the green mantle a decade ago--and in many ways, the Ford's a better daily driver. The 2013 Mazda CX-5 is an attractive and modern crossover with great handling and surprising space, but sluggish acceleration.
TCC Likes
TCC Dislikes
Fuel Economy
Fuel Economy - City N/A mpg 26 mpg
Fuel Economy - Highway N/A mpg 35 mpg
Vehicle
EPA Classification - 4WD Sport Utility Vehicle
Interior Dimensions
Second Leg Room (in) - 39.300
Front Head Room (in) - 40.100
Passenger Capacity - 5
Second Hip Room (in) - 53.700
Front Shoulder Room (in) - 57.500
Second Head Room (in) - 39.000
Second Shoulder Room (in) - 55.500
Front Leg Room (in) - 41.000
Passenger Volume (ft³) - 103.800
Front Hip Room (in) - 55.200
Exterior Dimensions
Track Width, Front (in) - 62.400
Min Ground Clearance (in) - 8.500
Length, Overall (in) - 179.300
Rear Door Opening Width (in) - 44.400
Height, Overall (in) - 67.300
Liftover Height (in) - 29.200
Track Width, Rear (in) - 62.500
Wheelbase (in) - 106.300
Rear Door Opening Height (in) - 32.600
Width, Max w/o mirrors (in) - 72.400
Cargo Area Dimensions
Cargo Box (Area) Height (in) - 34.600
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in) - - TBD -
Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³) - 65.400
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3 (in) - NA
Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³) - NA
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings (in) - 41.300
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in) - 38.700
Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³) - 34.100
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in) - 57.100
Brakes
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in) - 11.700 x 1.100
Drum - Rear (Yes or ) - NA
Brake ABS System - 4-Wheel
Disc - Rear (Yes or ) - Yes
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in) - 11.900 x 0.400
Brake Type - Pwr
Rear Drum Diam x Width (in) - NA
Disc - Front (Yes or ) - Yes
Fuel Tank
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal) - 14.8
Steering
Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall (ft) - 38.400
Steering Ratio (:1), Overall - 15.500
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft) - 36.700
Steering Type - Electric Rack & Pinion
Lock to Lock Turns (Steering) - 2.700
Tires
Rear Tire Order Code - NA
Front Tire Size - P225/65R17
Spare Tire Size - T145/90D16
Front Tire Order Code - NA
Spare Tire Order Code - NA
Rear Tire Size - P225/65R17
Trailering
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs) - 200
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs) - 300
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs) - 2000
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs) - 2000
Weight Information
Base Curb Weight (lbs) - 3208
Wheels
Spare Wheel Material - - TBD -
Front Wheel Size (in) - 17 x 7.0
Spare Wheel Size (in) - 16 x - TBD -
Rear Wheel Material - Aluminum
Rear Wheel Size (in) - 17 x 7.0
Front Wheel Material - Aluminum
Cooling System
Total Cooling System Capacity (qts) - 7.8
Electrical
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary) - - TBD -
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps) - 100
Engine
Engine Order Code - NA
Displacement - 2.0L/122
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM - 155 @ 6000
Engine Type - Gas I4
Fuel System - Direct Injection
SAE Net Torque @ RPM - 150 @ 4000
Mileage
EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG) - 35
EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG) - 26
Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG) - 29
Transmission
Clutch Size (in) - NA
Third Gear Ratio (:1) - 1.300
Trans Type - 6
Transfer Case Gear Ratio (:1), High - NA
Fifth Gear Ratio (:1) - 0.837
Trans Description Cont. Again - NA
Reverse Ratio (:1) - 3.724
Second Gear Ratio (:1) - 1.947
Trans Order Code - NA
Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1) - 4.705
Fourth Gear Ratio (:1) - 1.029
Trans Description Cont. - Manual
Drivetrain - Front Wheel Drive
Transfer Case Gear Ratio (:1), Low - NA
Sixth Gear Ratio (:1) - 0.680
First Gear Ratio (:1) - 3.700
Summary
Body Style - Sport Utility Vehicle
Vehicle Name - Mazda CX-5
Suspension
Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Rear (in) - - TBD -
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.) - NA
Shock Absorber Diameter - Front (mm) - - TBD -
Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Front (in) - - TBD -
Suspension Type - Rear - Multi-Link
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.) - NA
Shock Absorber Diameter - Rear (mm) - - TBD -
Suspension Type - Front - MacPherson Strut
Emissions
Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year - 6.3
Crash Test Ratings
Overall Rating -
Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating -
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver -
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger -
Overall Side Crash Rating -
Side Barrier Rating -
Side Barrier Rating Driver -
Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat -
Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat -
Combined Side Rating Front Seat -
Combined Side Rating Rear Seat -
Rollover Rating -
 
© 2014 The Car Connection. All Rights Reserved. The Car Connection is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by izmo, Inc. Send us feedback.