By
Rex Roy, Detroit EditorRex Roy
To bring you this review that covers all the bases, TheCarConnection.com's editors read reviews from a wide range of sources regarding the new
2009 Nissan Sentra. Experts from TheCarConnection.com also drove several different Sentra models, including the 2.0 L, SL, SE-R, and Spec V, and brought additional observations to help you make the best choice.
Likes:
- Spacious, quiet interior
- Fuel economy
- Big glove box and plenty of storage spaces
Dislikes:
- Offered as a sedan only
- CVT automatic brings out engine drone
- Styling won’t turn any heads
Buying Tips:
If you are looking for an automatic transmission, make sure you spend some time with the CVT in the Sentra to make sure it is something you can live with. The "rubber band" effect and additional engine drone might not work for picky commuters who spend a lot of time in the car.
The 2009 Nissan Sentra is a compact sedan that slots above the Versa model in size and price. Although it is built on mechanical underpinnings closely related to those of the Versa, the Sentra has a very different appearance and driving feel.
The Nissan Sentra comes in three distinct flavors: mild, spicy, and wild. The mild versions (2.0, 2.0 S and 2.0 SL) feature a 140-horsepower 2.0-liter four-cylinder mated to either a six-speed manual (S) or Nissan’s Xtronic Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) in the S or SL. The spicy SE-R trim ups the ante with a 177-horsepower motor displacing 2.5 liters from four cylinders matched with the CVT only. The wild and crazy SE-R Spec V has a 200-horsepower version and six-speed manual transmission. All Sentras are front-wheel drive only.
The Sentra gets good fuel economy from its 140-horsepower 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine, which is peppy with either transmission, but your driving experience may be dampened if you choose the CVT. The CVT auto isn’t quite as pleasing to drive with Nissan’s four-cylinder engines as it is with its V-6s, and it can bring out the engine’s coarse drone under acceleration. TheCarConnection.com recommends the manual transmission with the Sentra; it’s a little clunkier in feel than the one used in past Sentras, but makes for a more pleasant drive.
Don’t expect sportscar handling either in the non-enthusiast models, and you won’t be disappointed. The ride quality is quite smooth, with a suspension clearly not tuned for high-performance driving. The top SE-R Spec V on the other hand has a performance-tuned suspension that gives up a little bit of ride comfort, but it should still be quite tolerable for commuters in all but the most pothole-ridden places.
Both the performance models feature significant enhancements over lesser Sentra models because the SE-R and Spec V utilize 177- and 200-hp versions of the larger 2.5-liter four-cylinder found in the Nissan Altima sedan and Rogue crossover. Suspensions, brakes, and interiors are also beefed up.
A roomy, quiet interior is what most separates the 2009 Nissan Sentra from its competitors, though its sedan-only body style limits its appeal when compared to the likes of the Honda Civic. The cabin of the 2009 Nissan Sentra feels spacious, seating is comfortable, and appointments are generous even in base 2.0 and 2.0 S models, even if materials feel just appropriate for this price range.
The base Sentra makes a great high-value commuter car given its solid list of standard features, including six airbags, and good fuel economy. Moving on up to the 2.0 S trim gets you anti-lock brakes as standard, and the high-end 2.0 SL gets you leather and Bluetooth. Unfortunately, going for the full-lux edition limits your transmission choice to the CVT.
Other Choices:
If you're interested in the 2009 Nissan Sentra, also consider:
Reason Why:
The 2009 Nissan Sentra stands in the middle of a fiercely competitive class with many excellent offerings. The 2010 Mazda3 launches in early 2009 and offers features not found on any other competitors; it’s also an enthusiast favorite. The 2009 Honda Civic matches the variety, including coupe and sedan body styles and multiple powertrains—even hybrid and natural gas—and it has more interior style than most others in this class. The 2009 Toyota Corolla has been recently redesigned, and its LE trim level is very attractive. The Ford Focus puts forth a coupe alongside the sedan, plus Ford’s unique SYNC hands-free system and great fuel economy, but it can’t compete with the Sentra on looks. The 2009 Hyundai Elantra and Dodge Caliber lag this pack in overall refinement and style.
The Bottom Line:
The 2009 Nissan Sentra is a worthy contender in the compact segment, but the CVT transmission may turn off some buyers.
To bring you this review that covers all the bases, TheCarConnection.com's editors read reviews from a wide range of sources regarding the new 2009 Nissan Sentra. Experts from TheCarConnection.com also drove several different Sentra models, including the 2.0 L, SL, SE-R, and Spec V, and brought additional observations to help you make the best choice.
Likes:Spacious, quiet interiorFuel economyBig glove box and plenty of storage spacesDislikes:Offered as a sedan onlyCVT automatic brings out engine droneStyling won’t turn any headsBuying Tips:
If you are looking for an automatic transmission, make sure you spend some time with the CVT in the Sentra to make sure it is something you can live with. The "rubber band" effect and additional engine drone might not work for picky commuters who spend a lot of time in the car.
The 2009 Nissan Sentra is a compact sedan that slots above the Versa model in size and price. Although it is built on mechanical underpinnings closely related to those of the Versa, the Sentra has a very different appearance and driving feel.
The Nissan Sentra comes in three distinct flavors: mild, spicy, and wild. The mild versions (2.0, 2.0 S and 2.0 SL) feature a 140-horsepower 2.0-liter four-cylinder mated to either a six-speed manual (S) or Nissan’s Xtronic Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) in the S or SL. The spicy SE-R trim ups the ante with a 177-horsepower motor displacing 2.5 liters from four cylinders matched with the CVT only. The wild and crazy SE-R Spec V has a 200-horsepower version and six-speed manual transmission. All Sentras are front-wheel drive only.
The Sentra gets good fuel economy from its 140-horsepower 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine, which is peppy with either transmission, but your driving experience may be dampened if you choose the CVT. The CVT auto isn’t quite as pleasing to drive with Nissan’s four-cylinder engines as it is with its V-6s, and it can bring out the engine’s coarse drone under acceleration. TheCarConnection.com recommends the manual transmission with the Sentra; it’s a little clunkier in feel than the one used in past Sentras, but makes for a more pleasant drive.
Don’t expect sportscar handling either in the non-enthusiast models, and you won’t be disappointed. The ride quality is quite smooth, with a suspension clearly not tuned for high-performance driving. The top SE-R Spec V on the other hand has a performance-tuned suspension that gives up a little bit of ride comfort, but it should still be quite tolerable for commuters in all but the most pothole-ridden places.
Both the performance models feature significant enhancements over lesser Sentra models because the SE-R and Spec V utilize 177- and 200-hp versions of the larger 2.5-liter four-cylinder found in the Nissan Altima sedan and Rogue crossover. Suspensions, brakes, and interiors are also beefed up.
A roomy, quiet interior is what most separates the 2009 Nissan Sentra from its competitors, though its sedan-only body style limits its appeal when compared to the likes of the Honda Civic. The cabin of the 2009 Nissan Sentra feels spacious, seating is comfortable, and appointments are generous even in base 2.0 and 2.0 S models, even if materials feel just appropriate for this price range.
The base Sentra makes a great high-value commuter car given its solid list of standard features, including six airbags, and good fuel economy. Moving on up to the 2.0 S trim gets you anti-lock brakes as standard, and the high-end 2.0 SL gets you leather and Bluetooth. Unfortunately, going for the full-lux edition limits your transmission choice to the CVT.
Other Choices:If you're interested in the 2009 Nissan Sentra, also consider:Dodge CaliberFord FocusHonda CivicHyundai ElantraMazda Mazda3Toyota CorollaReason Why:The 2009 Nissan Sentra stands in the middle of a fiercely competitive class with many excellent offerings. The 2010 Mazda3 launches in early 2009 and offers features not found on any other competitors; it’s also an enthusiast favorite. The 2009 Honda Civic matches the variety, including coupe and sedan body styles and multiple powertrains—even hybrid and natural gas—and it has more interior style than most others in this class. The 2009 Toyota Corolla has been recently redesigned, and its LE trim level is very attractive. The Ford Focus puts forth a coupe alongside the sedan, plus Ford’s unique SYNC hands-free system and great fuel economy, but it can’t compete with the Sentra on looks. The 2009 Hyundai Elantra and Dodge Caliber lag this pack in overall refinement and style.
The Bottom Line:The 2009 Nissan Sentra is a worthy contender in the compact segment, but the CVT transmission may turn off some buyers.
To bring you this review that covers all the bases, TheCarConnection.com's editors read reviews from a wide range of sources regarding the new 2009 Nissan Sentra. Experts from TheCarConnection.com also drove several different Sentra models, including the 2.0 L, SL, SE-R, and Spec V, and ...
Comments (2 total)
By Brett #1, Posted: 4/29/2009
'07 Sentra
We've had our standard 2.0 Sentra (2007) for a year or so and I can confidently say that it was a great purchase. We paid $16,400 CAD all taxes in and for the money it has more pep than a base line Corolla and a better ride than a Civic. We also drove from Calgary to Kamloops (700km+) on one tank. Over all, what is there to complain about... it's comfortable, looks good and is economical.
By Kelsey V. #2, Posted: 7/24/2009
I have had my Nissan Sentra sine 2007. At first I really liked it, but I rushed into it because I was in desperate need for a car. It was affordable and cute, I only paid 16,000 for it.
Throughout the last few years I have slowly started to see things falling apart. The paint above the c.d player started to chip, and the parts just started to pop apart. Next week I will have to bring it to the shop to get it worked on because what is holding the engine in the car is deteriorating. Wonderful huh?
Yeah, I still love my car.. but I think it is time to trade it in.
Post a comment