2009 GMC Canyon Bottom Line

March 7, 2009
To bring you a comprehensive, definitive review on the 2009 GMC Canyon, TheCarConnection.com’s team of writers has researched a range of reviews from some of the most respected sources on the Web. To bring you an especially useful review, TheCarConnection.com's editors have driven the GMC Canyon—including the newly offered V-8 model—and contribute their impressions, observations, and comparisons.

Likes:

  • Relaxed and fast demeanor with the V-8
  • Range of body styles and configurations
  • Frugal four-cylinder/manual drivetrain
  • In its short-bed form, it’s a true compact truck

Dislikes:

  • Steering/roadholding
  • Rough, noisy four- and five-cylinders
  • Unimpressive plastics inside
  • No bed longer than six feet

Buying Tips:


Top 4WD V-8 Crew Cab models can exceed $35,000 if you go crazy with the options. Take it easy or you could end up spending more for a Canyon than you would for a full-size pickup.

The GMC Canyon and its almost identical Chevrolet sibling, the Colorado, went on sale five years ago as replacements for the Sonoma and S-10. The 2009 GMC Canyon is one of the few small pickups available that fills a niche for those who want a capable truck that’s more maneuverable and fuel-efficient than its full-size counterparts.

Almost identical to the Chevrolet Colorado—though a bit better-looking, in the opinion of TheCarConnection.com—the Canyon is available in regular and extended cab configurations with a six-foot bed, and as a crew cab with a five-foot bed. All models come in either two- or four-wheel drive with either the Z85 standard suspension or the Z71 off-road setup. The retuned-for-2009 ZQ8 sport suspension is only available on two-wheel-drive extended cab and crew cab models with the new 5.3-liter V-8 engine.

The new V-8 outputs 300 horsepower and 320 pound-feet of torque, accelerates from zero to 60 mph in less than seven seconds, and can tow up to 6,000 pounds. It brings a very torquey, relaxed character to these trucks, and it’s powerful enough to take off at stoplights almost as quickly as a muscle car.

The V-8 joins the returning 2.9-liter inline four-cylinder and 3.7-liter inline five-cylinder engines that, due to a revised fuel control module, feature better fuel economy for 2009. The 185-horsepower four-cylinder gets ratings of up to 25 mpg highway now, while the 242-horsepower five-cylinder musters an EPA-rated 15 mpg city, 20 mpg highway with the automatic transmission. Both smaller-size engines are rather noisy and unrefined, even compared to those in other inexpensive pickups like the Toyota Tacoma or Ford Ranger.

A bunch of other improvements for 2009 make the Colorado and Canyon a better vehicle overall and boost its ratings from TheCarConnection.com. Electronic stability control is at last standard across the lineup, and brakes have been been fortified for 2009; they feel more reassuring than what we remember from previous drives. But steering remains a weak point; it seems vague and reluctant to unwind on twisty roads and tends to require frequent adjustments on the highway.

The interior is the Canyon’s Achilles’ heel. Cursed with cheap-feeling switchgear and hard plastic, the Canyon makes for a good work truck. On the upside, the Canyon will probably please serious buyers, with a simple, straightforward instrument panel layout, featuring push-button controls for the 4WD system mounted high. And front seats, though flat-feeling, provide a good driving position, while in back on Crew Cab models there’s plenty of space for two adults or three kids.

However, serious workers will probably be dismayed to find that four-door Canyons have only a 5-foot, 1-inch bed, and the 6-foot "long" bed on two-door models won't fit a 4x8 sheet of plywood flat.

Standard equipment includes air conditioning, a tilt steering wheel, cruise control, and folding exterior mirrors. Options such as traction control, XM, fog lamps, leather seats, a sunroof, a six-CD changer, and a sliding rear window are available. OnStar is offered, but there is no navigation system—a real need in work trucks.

The four-door GMC Canyon receives five-star crash scores, while other versions get four stars. The addition of standard StabiliTrack electronic stability control is a very positive move in the safety area.

Other Choices:

If you like the 2009 GMC Canyon, also consider:

Reason Why:

The Chevrolet Colorado is nearly identical to the Canyon in every way—except for different grilles and slight variations in badging and trim. The Ford Ranger reigns as the strongest competitor to the Canyon and Colorado; the Ranger is an aging design, but at the four-cylinder level it’s more enjoyable to drive than the GM twins and gets decent fuel economy. The Ranger also comes in a wide range of configurations, including strong V-6 versions, although it doesn’t compete with the new V-8. The Toyota Tacoma is a step larger, but it gives the Canyon a run for the money, as its base price is more than $1,000 lower, with strong, smooth performance from its standard four-cylinder engine and hearty, competitive hauling power from its optional V-6. The Tacoma also has especially solid resale value. The Nissan Frontier feels larger, though it comes with a base four-cylinder engine or an exceptionally torquey and smooth 3.5-liter V-6. The Dakota is another alternative, but in terms of size it’s just short of full-size trucks; it’s not as maneuverable and gets less-than-stellar fuel economy from its V-6 and V-8 engines.

The Bottom Line:

With the addition of the new V-8 option, the 2009 GMC Canyon goes from unappealing to quite competitive.

To bring you a comprehensive, definitive review on the 2009 GMC Canyon, TheCarConnection.com’s team of writers has researched a range of reviews from some of the most respected sources on the Web. To bring you an especially useful review, TheCarConnection.com's editors have driven the GMC Canyon—including the newly offered V-8 model—and contribute their impressions, observations, and comparisons. Likes:Relaxed and fast demeanor with the V-8Range of body styles and configurationsFrugal four-cylinder/manual drivetrainIn its short-bed form, it’s a true compact truckDislikes:Steering/roadholdingRough, noisy four- and five-cylindersUnimpressive plastics insideNo bed longer than six feetBuying Tips: Top 4WD V-8 Crew Cab models can exceed $35,000 if you go crazy with the options. Take it easy or you could end up spending more for a Canyon than you would for a full-size pickup. The GMC Canyon and its almost identical Chevrolet sibling, the Colorado, went on sale five years ago as replacements for the Sonoma and S-10. The 2009 GMC Canyon is one of the few small pickups available that fills a niche for those who want a capable truck that’s more maneuverable and fuel-efficient than its full-size counterparts. Almost identical to the Chevrolet Colorado—though a bit better-looking, in the opinion of TheCarConnection.com—the Canyon is available in regular and extended cab configurations with a six-foot bed, and as a crew cab with a five-foot bed. All models come in either two- or four-wheel drive with either the Z85 standard suspension or the Z71 off-road setup. The retuned-for-2009 ZQ8 sport suspension is only available on two-wheel-drive extended cab and crew cab models with the new 5.3-liter V-8 engine. The new V-8 outputs 300 horsepower and 320 pound-feet of torque, accelerates from zero to 60 mph in less than seven seconds, and can tow up to 6,000 pounds. It brings a very torquey, relaxed character to these trucks, and it’s powerful enough to take off at stoplights almost as quickly as a muscle car. The V-8 joins the returning 2.9-liter inline four-cylinder and 3.7-liter inline five-cylinder engines that, due to a revised fuel control module, feature better fuel economy for 2009. The 185-horsepower four-cylinder gets ratings of up to 25 mpg highway now, while the 242-horsepower five-cylinder musters an EPA-rated 15 mpg city, 20 mpg highway with the automatic transmission. Both smaller-size engines are rather noisy and unrefined, even compared to those in other inexpensive pickups like the Toyota Tacoma or Ford Ranger. A bunch of other improvements for 2009 make the Colorado and Canyon a better vehicle overall and boost its ratings from TheCarConnection.com. Electronic stability control is at last standard across the lineup, and brakes have been been fortified for 2009; they feel more reassuring than what we remember from previous drives. But steering remains a weak point; it seems vague and reluctant to unwind on twisty roads and tends to require frequent adjustments on the highway. The interior is the Canyon’s Achilles’ heel. Cursed with cheap-feeling switchgear and hard plastic, the Canyon makes for a good work truck. On the upside, the Canyon will probably please serious buyers, with a simple, straightforward instrument panel layout, featuring push-button controls for the 4WD system mounted high. And front seats, though flat-feeling, provide a good driving position, while in back on Crew Cab models there’s plenty of space for two adults or three kids. However, serious workers will probably be dismayed to find that four-door Canyons have only a 5-foot, 1-inch bed, and the 6-foot "long" bed on two-door models won't fit a 4x8 sheet of plywood flat. Standard equipment includes air conditioning, a tilt steering wheel, cruise control, and folding exterior mirrors. Options such as traction control, XM, fog lamps, leather seats, a sunroof, a six-CD changer, and a sliding rear window are available. OnStar is offered, but there is no navigation system—a real need in work trucks. The four-door GMC Canyon receives five-star crash scores, while other versions get four stars. The addition of standard StabiliTrack electronic stability control is a very positive move in the safety area. Other Choices:If you like the 2009 GMC Canyon, also consider:Ford RangerChevrolet ColoradoToyota TacomaNissan FrontierDodge DakotaReason Why:The Chevrolet Colorado is nearly identical to the Canyon in every way—except for different grilles and slight variations in badging and trim. The Ford Ranger reigns as the strongest competitor to the Canyon and Colorado; the Ranger is an aging design, but at the four-cylinder level it’s more enjoyable to drive than the GM twins and gets decent fuel economy. The Ranger also comes in a wide range of configurations, including strong V-6 versions, although it doesn’t compete with the new V-8. The Toyota Tacoma is a step larger, but it gives the Canyon a run for the money, as its base price is more than $1,000 lower, with strong, smooth performance from its standard four-cylinder engine and hearty, competitive hauling power from its optional V-6. The Tacoma also has especially solid resale value. The Nissan Frontier feels larger, though it comes with a base four-cylinder engine or an exceptionally torquey and smooth 3.5-liter V-6. The Dakota is another alternative, but in terms of size it’s just short of full-size trucks; it’s not as maneuverable and gets less-than-stellar fuel economy from its V-6 and V-8 engines. The Bottom Line:With the addition of the new V-8 option, the 2009 GMC Canyon goes from unappealing to quite competitive. To bring you a comprehensive, definitive review on the 2009 GMC Canyon, TheCarConnection.com’s team of writers has researched a range of reviews from some of the most respected sources on the Web. To bring you an especially useful review, TheCarConnection.com's editors have driven the GMC ...

Other Choices:

The Chevrolet Colorado is nearly identical to the Canyon in every way—except for different grilles and slight variations in badging and trim. The Ford Ranger reigns as the strongest competitor to the Canyon and Colorado; the Ranger is an aging design, but at the four-cylinder level it’s more enjoyable to drive than the GM twins and gets decent fuel economy. The Ranger also comes in a wide range of configurations, including strong V-6 versions, although it doesn’t compete with the new V-8. The Toyota Tacoma is a step larger, but it gives the Canyon a run for the money, as its base price is more than $1,000 lower, with strong, smooth performance from its standard four-cylinder engine and hearty, competitive hauling power from its optional V-6. The Tacoma also has especially solid resale value. The Nissan Frontier feels larger, though it comes with a base four-cylinder engine or an exceptionally torquey and smooth 3.5-liter V-6. The Dakota is another alternative, but in terms of size it’s just short of full-size trucks; it’s not as maneuverable and gets less-than-stellar fuel economy from its V-6 and V-8 engines.

Next Steps:

Get a free price quote

for the 2009 GMC Canyon from a dealer near you

Check Insurance Rates

for the 2009 GMC Canyon

Check Financing Rates

for the 2009 GMC Canyon

Check Local Classifieds

for a 2009 GMC Canyon near you

See the GMC Canyon in Other Years:

2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004

Comments (0 total)

Be the first to post a comment

Post a comment

Post anonymously, or
(Required)
(Required - will not be published, sold or shared)
(Optional - your 'posted by' name will link to the URL)

Remember Me?

I have read TheCarConnection.com's privacy policy