• fr8bil avatar fr8bil Posted: 1/22/2013 2:27pm PST

    Turbos are great provided the owner knows how to take care of them at shut-down so they don't coke up and die prematurely. That involves installing a device to insure the turbo is cooled off and has slowed down pre-shut off. Currently, Ford does not install that device as OEM on its' turbo-diesel or gas engines. Several aftermarket devices are available to protect turbo bearings from the premature shut down blues but most turbo-gas engine owners will not become aware of this problem until failure occurs. The Ford Turbo-diesel guys install them in a high percentage of their trucks. The thought of a "start-stop" cycle in Ford's future "Eco-Boost" engines makes me want to run out and buy stock in Garrett Turbo Company owned by Honeywell..

  • fb_1575318940 avatar fb_1575318940 Posted: 1/22/2013 5:06pm PST

    Hopefully like the older Nissan 350Z turbos they will start using the turbo timers, but what you bring up is a crucial overlooked point.

  • fb_514123874 avatar Andrew Posted: 6/20/2013 7:08am PDT

    yep, especially if they do go to start/stop. imagine being stuck at say, an accident or road crew. the truck shuts off immediately after some spirited freeway driving. turbo is good and red hot, and you suddenly shut it off. over. and over. imagine how good it will coke in layers. it also pains me to think of this compounded by the fact people who change their own oil will continue running their trusted castrol gtx or base level conventional oils. castrol is awesome, but in turbos you'll want synthetic. people dont know these things. they dont need to be told WHAT to use, they need to also know WHY and what happens if you DONT. i work at O'Reillys and I went to school building engines. EDUCATE someone, they will make informed decisions.

  • fb_82100996 avatar Richard Posted: 1/22/2013 3:38pm PST

    Great to see the Big-3 are finally starting to get real about fuel savings. The cost to fill up a full-size pickup or SUV is brutal today, even with gas below $4/gallon.

    Now… if we could reduce the BULK and SIZE of those ridiculously big trucks or at least convince Ford to build the new world Ranger here...

  • fb_514123874 avatar Andrew Posted: 6/20/2013 7:14am PDT

    good point. its ironic that for 50 years trucks were smaller, had about 100hp flatheads at best, and still got work done. If my Subaru Baja had a tow hitch I could haul damn near anything. I hauled a 4k lb blazer 20 miles with my Tacoma 2.4L 2wd and it didnt even strain. Payload sucked but not every truck on the market needs to look like a Nissan Titan or F150. The S10 sucked but its gone, Colorado I guess is a choice, no more Rangers which as of late were good trucks. Dakotas are around still but are the only midsize to take a v8 still. They could be refined to get 28mpg with such lighter weight if Dodge actually tried.

  • fb_514123874 avatar Andrew Posted: 6/20/2013 7:16am PDT

    dont get me wrong I can always use my dads silverado if I need to haul idk...gravel for instance. But I dont think everyone needs a Tahoe, and I dont think everyone needs an F150 or z71. My Baja has way more hp and torque than my tacoma did, its AWD too so if it is hooked on it will pull like a sled dog mud rain or snow. and it off roads better to boot.

  • fb_1036215057 avatar Paul Posted: 1/22/2013 11:46am PST

    Ford's strategy of giving customers choices is clearly better. Like GM, Ford offers a naturally aspirated V6 and 2 V8s. (5.0 and a 6.2) The difference is that Ford also offers customers another alternative, the well liked EcoBoost V6, which put Ford miles ahead of GM. It's also worth noting that Ford's 3 normally aspirated engines still supercedes GM's interms of hp, torque and fuel economy.

  • fb_1224815454 avatar Jim Posted: 1/22/2013 12:43pm PST

    Ford covers all the bases, including home plate. GM only covers 2, big engine, smaller engine.