• Jim Posted: 7/19/2010 1:30pm PDT

    I agree wholeheartedly with the comment on stability control. But more importantly is the 5 year comprehensive warranty.For a young person or couple buying their first new car, the extra two years are huge and worth enough points to leapfrog it above the Civic.
    And I don't buy that you had to compare the Corolla instead of the Forte. More of the people that read your reviews are looking for new info and not the same info that Corolla has generated for over a decade. Keep up the good work.

  • Monica Posted: 12/28/2009 4:50pm PST

    Akshay must be from south.

  • Wow Posted: 9/23/2009 7:57pm PDT

    Statistically, Hondas (and Toyotas for that matter) have a much higher life expectancy than Fords, or Dodge for that matter, and I don't know much about german safety innovations, but I do know how to read a crash test report, for which the Honda Civic performs exceptionally. And it blows my mind that a Kia is even being compared to a Civic and a Focus when the Toyota Corolla is probably the biggest competitor to the Civic or the Focus. So I do, however, have to agree that apples are indeed being compared to pears (among other things).
    And no, there isn't anything fashionable about a Kia.

  • olle Posted: 9/21/2009 9:19am PDT

    this comparison stinks. the article contain errors, make apple-to-pear comparisons and has a very scewed idea of what matters and what doesnt matter, at least when it comes to car safety.
    take stability control. invented some 15 years ago in germany, it is the most important safety feature since the invention of the safety belt. reducing single-vehicle fatalities with over 30% it saves more life than airbags. the 2010 forte has this feature as standard. at $13.6k, it is by far the cheapest car ever outfitted with this expensive and important feature.
    now as for the ford focus. its beyond me why an author would compare a '10 fore with an '09 focus when the '10 focus is already on the market. anyway the '09 had stability control as an option. the '10 has it as standard. so in an apple-to-apple comparison ford and kia are equals here, although kias vehicle is significantly cheaper.
    finally, regarding the civic, for which the author claims "Safety gear is almost comprehensive--stability control is an option on base models" given the importance of stability control its questionable how a car that doesnt have it as standard can be labeled as "almost comprehensive" but it gets worse. contrary to what is claimed in this comparison, the 2010 civics STILL DOESNT OFFER STABILITY CONTROL EVEN AS AN OPTION on any of the sub 20k trims. honda has to be just about the only manufacturer on the market still denying this critical safety feature, even to a customer willing to pay extra for it. it is beyond me how an otherwise progressive manufacturer like honda can be worst in class in this regard, obviously waiting for the 2013 federal law that requires it as standard.
    anyone who would not be willing to buy a new car without safety belts logically also ought to avoid the civic like the plague, and why not boycott honda all together for this cynisim of theirs.

  • Akshay Posted: 9/3/2009 3:37pm PDT

    Honda and all other like Toyota are like dum i prefer ford, dodge and all american because they all are no.1 in comfortably and performance