Flint: Chrysler\'s In Play
Chrysler is in play. That's the Wall Street term meaning that a company is up for sale and its stock will get lively. DaimlerChrysler stock was up by $6 a share the day after the game began.
The Germans running DaimlerChrysler's board of supervisors want out. And if they can't get out all the way, they would accept a partner to share the risk. Why? Chrysler is losing money, $1.5 billion last year.
Heck, that's chump change in today's world. Well, guess what: smart — you know smart, the tiny European car they make — has lost lots more than that over the years and they aren't dumping smart. And Chrysler prospects are a lot brighter than smart prospects, even when they sell them Stateside.
I suspect the snotty Germans just don't think Chrysler is good enough to associate with their three-pointed Mercedes star. And half of that German supervisory board is made up of representatives of labor, including unions — that's German law. Unions don't like money they consider theirs going outside the country to support other operations. It was the French unions that pressured Renault long ago to sell off American Motors — later bought by Chrysler — just as the company was turning the corner thanks to a booming Jeep business.
Maybe I'm prejudiced here, but I'll remind you that Chrysler was doing just fine without Daimler. The profit was $3.5 billion in 1996. In fact, in four years from 1994 to 1997 Chrysler had net income of $12 billion, more than Daimler's. MORE--
Blame
I blame the Germans for the beginning of Chrysler's troubles.
When the Germans took over they froze the product development, got rid of all the executives that had led Chrysler to victory — remember their names, Lutz, Stallkamp, Gale, Pawley — and the $7 billion Chrysler had saved disappeared just as Daimler bought into Mitsubishi and Hyundai. Worse, they pushed Chrysler into accepting Mitsubishi platforms and engine designs for its future cars, a big mistake. And they pushed the decision to kill
Of course, later Dieter Zetsche and Wolfgang Bernhard (Bernhard just quit a high post at Volkswagen) came from
But back to what's happening now: Chrysler's in play but that doesn't mean anyone else is in the game. Personally, I don't think anything is going to happen. I can be wrong. The bankers have big commissions to earn if they can broker a deal. But I don't see it, not right now.
We can invent candidates as purchasers or partners: GM, Renault/Nissan, Shanghai Automotive, hedge funds, Bill Gates, or someone like him. But none of these make much sense.
GM is just getting its production capacity down and the last thing GM needs are more factories and workers with pension and health care rights.
Nissan actually has plenty of North American capacity right now and needs more sales, not more factories. There's also the question of whether Germans would actually admit that the French, meaning Carlos Ghosn of Renault, could do better with Chrysler than they, the Germans, did.
The Chinese would have a problem because our Congress would go bananas with the thought of American car factories being shut and production shifted to
Hedge funds are rich but they like to make lots of money very fast. Actually running an auto company is something else, and there are huge risks: the pension and healthcare benefits and layoff pay for all those workers if it doesn't work out. And there isn't any capital to be made selling off old auto plants.
Certainly a private takeover by a rich American sounds ideal — someone who has all the money in the world and wants an auto company instead of a football team. Has the Man from Microsoft ever dreamed of the Gates V-8? Maybe he has but he hasn't told anyone about it yet. MORE--
Talk is cheap – is Chrysler?
There's often lots of talk without action. Remember the Nissan/General Motors deal talk last year. And there are many secret talks. I personally know that Chrysler once tried to sell itself to Ford, and another time looked into a tie-in with Fiat, and that Fiat once proposed amalgamation with Ford, Nothing happened from all these look-sees. And most recent deals ended in failure: BMW and Rover, Daimler and Mitsubishi, GM and Fiat.
This is why I believe nothing will come of the Daimler talk of a bailout, especially if Chrysler's recovery plan shows signs of working. Again, it's easy to be wrong. But we'll see.
The point is that Chrysler doesn't need Daimler to be successful. The recovery plan outlined Wednesday seems reasonable. There are lots of new Chrysler vehicles coming on market: the Sebring and Dodge Avenger sedans, the Sebring convertible, the four-door Jeep Wrangler, the
Chrysler's North American production about matches last year while GM is down 16 percent and Ford is down 15 percent. Add this: Chrysler and Dodge vehicles traditionally are the third bestsellers in the
The point is that Chrysler, American Chrysler, isn't doing that badly right now. Of course, word that German Daimler wants to dump it won't help sales, or morale at the
But I've lived through a lot of Chrysler bouncebacks. And I expect to live through another one, too.
Related Articles
Chrysler-GM Match Denied by Joseph Szczesny (2/18/2007)
But joint projects are routinely discussed, execs say.
DC Cuts 13K Jobs--And Seeks New Partner? by Jim Burt (2/14/2007)
But who -- and will it be enough?
Morale Dead at Chrysler; Rumors Grow by Joseph Szczesny (2/19/2007)
German HQ in the driver’s seat with company’s future.
2007 Dodge Demon Concept by Marty Padgett (2/12/2007)
A “nimble” roadster for Dodge’s
2008 Dodge Dakota Preview by Marty Padgett (2/5/2007)
Squared off against the Tacoma et al.
2008 Dodge Avenger R/T by TCC Team (2/3/2007)
A revved-up look for a mid-sizer in a tough battle.
2008 Jeep Patriot by TCC Team (2/3/2007)
Waving the flag – and raising the bar.


Comments (0 total)
Be the first to post a comment
Post a comment